Zones of Slow Death? Social Descent, Epistemic Injustice and Temporality

In this article, we consider how zones of slow death can emerge from epistemic marginalization—specifically, the kind that occurs when a social group lacks shared interpretive models due to processes of “social descent.” Drawing on an ethnographic study of waste collectors who moved from skilled to low-skilled or unskilled labor, we explore how this epistemic marginalization is reinforced by the temporal framing of certain lives in the “past tense.” In this way, epistemic marginalization and temporal disqualification are intertwined: denying a group’s interpretive authority simultaneously enables the erasure of their claims to justice as outdated and obsolete.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Ethics Quarterly
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2025.10096
Primary Topic
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Zones of Slow Death? Social Descent, Epistemic Injustice and Temporality

Tim Newton, Natalia Slutskaya, Ramaswami Mahalingam, Ruxandra Monica Luca et al.
Business Ethics Quarterly
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
article

Zones of Slow Death? Social Descent, Epistemic Injustice and Temporality

Tim Newton, Natalia Slutskaya, Ramaswami Mahalingam, Ruxandra Monica Luca, Jessica Horne
article en

Abstract

In this article, we consider how zones of slow death can emerge from epistemic marginalization—specifically, the kind that occurs when a social group lacks shared interpretive models due to processes of “social descent.” Drawing on an ethnographic study of waste collectors who moved from skilled to low-skilled or unskilled labor, we explore how this epistemic marginalization is reinforced by the temporal framing of certain lives in the “past tense.” In this way, epistemic marginalization and temporal disqualification are intertwined: denying a group’s interpretive authority simultaneously enables the erasure of their claims to justice as outdated and obsolete.

Business Ethics QuarterlyVol. 35(4)
HEC Montréal (CA), University of Leicester (GB), University of Sussex (GB), University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Zones of Slow Death? Social Descent, Epistemic Injustice and Temporality — Tim Newton, Natalia Slutskaya, et al. · Business Ethics Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS