How Educational Leaders Think About Intersections of Identities and Disciplinary Learning in Science

ABSTRACT American science education leaders play critical roles in promoting equity in education, but little is known about how they understand everyday classroom interactions where inequities related to intersectionality are evident. This study examines science leaders' sensemaking about a scenario depicting the experiences of a group of American Black girl elementary students in an engineering design lesson, focusing on what leaders notice and how they propose to intervene to address problematic aspects of the students' experience. The responses were part of a survey given to a purposeful sample of 140 science education leaders from 18 states and analyzed by a team guided by an understanding of science as embedded within intersectional systems of oppression linked to race and racism, and gender and sexism. Most leaders noticed the students' experience was problematic; however, few respondents remarked on how racism or sexism might explain the students' experience. Most proposed interventions only with students or teachers, rather than addressing larger systemic issues that might have contributed to the situation. Our data suggest opportunities to support science education leaders and educators to have conversations that develop intersectional interpretations of everyday classroom practices and dynamics, as part of their efforts to promote equity in education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
School Science and Mathematics
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.70000
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Educational Leaders Think About Intersections of Identities and Disciplinary Learning in Science

Trang C. Tran, Annie Allen, William R. Penuel, Abby Rhinehart et al.
School Science and Mathematics
Career Development and Diversity
article

How Educational Leaders Think About Intersections of Identities and Disciplinary Learning in Science

Trang C. Tran, Annie Allen, William R. Penuel, Abby Rhinehart, Sarah Leonhart, Yamileth Salinas Del Val, Kristen L. Davidson, Riley Ceperich
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT American science education leaders play critical roles in promoting equity in education, but little is known about how they understand everyday classroom interactions where inequities related to intersectionality are evident. This study examines science leaders' sensemaking about a scenario depicting the experiences of a group of American Black girl elementary students in an engineering design lesson, focusing on what leaders notice and how they propose to intervene to address problematic aspects of the students' experience. The responses were part of a survey given to a purposeful sample of 140 science education leaders from 18 states and analyzed by a team guided by an understanding of science as embedded within intersectional systems of oppression linked to race and racism, and gender and sexism. Most leaders noticed the students' experience was problematic; however, few respondents remarked on how racism or sexism might explain the students' experience. Most proposed interventions only with students or teachers, rather than addressing larger systemic issues that might have contributed to the situation. Our data suggest opportunities to support science education leaders and educators to have conversations that develop intersectional interpretations of everyday classroom practices and dynamics, as part of their efforts to promote equity in education.

School Science and Mathematics
University of Alaska Anchorage (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Washington (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Colorado Boulder
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.