Changes in dangerous and competitive worldviews during the coronavirus epidemic: Evidence from a large-scale U.S. panel study

In a large ( N = 1,600) nationally representative and longitudinal survey of the American population, conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic we investigated whether dangerous or competitive worldviews shifted. Results show that across the span of one year (i.e., the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic), dangerous but not competitive worldviews, as measured via the dual-process of prejudice framework, significantly increased. This increase was significantly larger for conservatives, whites and older Americans. Further, those who endorsed both worldviews highly at T1 (April 2020) reported significantly smaller increases on average at T2 (August 2021), suggesting that the world was perceived as more dangerous and more competitive one year later particularly for those who saw it as safer and more cooperative at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings highlight that worldviews are malleable, and that specific demographic characteristics and individual differences influence changes in worldviews across time.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.15643
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in dangerous and competitive worldviews during the coronavirus epidemic: Evidence from a large-scale U.S. panel study

Brian Lickel, Ezra M. Markowitz, Joel Ginn, Andrea Mah et al.
Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Changes in dangerous and competitive worldviews during the coronavirus epidemic: Evidence from a large-scale U.S. panel study

Brian Lickel, Ezra M. Markowitz, Joel Ginn, Andrea Mah, Stylianos Syropoulos, Katherine L. Dixon–Gordon, Tatishe Nteta, Allecia E. Reid, Daniel R. Ames, Se Min Suh
article en

Abstract

In a large ( N = 1,600) nationally representative and longitudinal survey of the American population, conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic we investigated whether dangerous or competitive worldviews shifted. Results show that across the span of one year (i.e., the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic), dangerous but not competitive worldviews, as measured via the dual-process of prejudice framework, significantly increased. This increase was significantly larger for conservatives, whites and older Americans. Further, those who endorsed both worldviews highly at T1 (April 2020) reported significantly smaller increases on average at T2 (August 2021), suggesting that the world was perceived as more dangerous and more competitive one year later particularly for those who saw it as safer and more cooperative at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings highlight that worldviews are malleable, and that specific demographic characteristics and individual differences influence changes in worldviews across time.

Journal of Social and Political PsychologyVol. 13(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Changes in dangerous and competitive worldviews during the coronavirus epidemic: Evidence from a large-scale U.S. panel study — Brian Lickel, Ezra M. Markowitz, et al. · Journal of Social and Political Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS