Regulating Local Mn─O Coordination to Suppress the Intrinsic Anti‐Site Defects in Mn‐Based Phosphate Cathodes
Abstract The Mn‐based phosphate Na 3+2x Mn 1+x Ti 1‐x (PO 4 ) 3 cathodes have attracted widespread attention for Na‐ion batteries owing to the abundant Mn resource and high Mn 2+ /Mn 3+ /Mn 4+ redox potential. However, they suffer from high voltage hysteresis and low reversible capacity at 2.5–4.2 V (60–80 mAh g−1) due to intrinsic anti‐site defects of Mn 2+ occupying Na2 vacancies. Although metal ion substitutions (e.g., V 3+ ) can reduce intrinsic anti‐site defects and improve reversible capacity (80–110 mAh g −1 ), the underlying mechanism remains not well‐understood, limiting further improvement of the reversible capacity. Here, five metal‐ion substitution cathodes: Na 3.4 Mn 1.15 Ti 0.75 M 0.1 (PO 4 ) 3 (M = Fe 3+ , Al 3+ , V 3+ , Cr 3+ , and Ga 3+ ) are systematically studied, among which only two metal ions (V 3+ and Cr 3+ ) can remarkably reduce intrinsic Mn 2+ /Na2 anti‐site defect and voltage hysteresis. The revealed mechanism is that V 3+ and Cr 3+ substitutions tend to form a MnO 5 polyhedron with the less Mn─O coordination numbers under the assumption of Mn 2+ occupying the Na2 vacancy, compared to the MnO 6 octahedron in other metal‐ion substitutions (Fe 3+ , Al 3+ , and Ga 3+ ). The formation of MnO 5 polyhedron indicates an energetically more unfavorable state for Mn 2+ /Na2 anti‐site defects. The designed Na 3.5 Mn 1.15 Ti 0.65 V 0.1 Cr 0.1 (PO 4 ) 3 cathode exhibits the lowest ratio of intrinsic anti‐site defect (0.28%) and achieves a high reversible capacity (120.7 mAh g −1 ) and high energy density (431.6 Wh kg −1 ), with superior cycling stability (93.2% retention after 2000 cycles at 5 C). This work offers valuable insights for designing high‐capacity and high‐energy Mn‐based Na‐ion cathodes.
Authors
- Junmei Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6809-5032)
- Feng Yan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4855-5123)
- Chen Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9848-4418)
- Zhiyi Lv (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1687-4277)
- Yong‐Sheng Hu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8430-6474)
- Liwei Jiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5675-888X)
- Xusheng Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8751-7958)
- Zhihao Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0254-2113)
- Xiaowei Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2032-4742)
- Qiang Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2672-0917)
- Weixiang Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1424-4562)
- Yang Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2671-0951)
- Lilu Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2992-7577)
- Ya‐Xia Yin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0983-9916)
Institutions
- FZU ‒ Institute of Physics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (CZ)
- Institute of Process Engineering (CN)
- National Laboratory for Superconductivity (CN)
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Xinjiang University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Published
- 2025-11-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202505250
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Advancements in Battery Materials
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.73