Access to Credit and Mechanisation Service Expenditure: An Analysis Considering Access, Sources, Purposes and Amounts of Credit

ABSTRACT This study estimates the impact of access to credit on mechanisation service expenditure by considering farmers' binary credit access decisions and distinguishing between formal and informal credit access. We employ a conditional mixed process model to address selection bias issues and use open‐access data from the Rural Development Institute at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (Beijing, China) through the 2020 China Rural Revitalization Survey. The theoretical analyses suggest that relaxing credit constraints enables farmers to achieve higher net returns by increasing all variable inputs, including farm machines, until they achieve the expected optimal level. The empirical results reveal that access to credit significantly increases mechanisation service expenditure by 115.5 yuan/mu, and the impact is larger on farmers cultivating small‐ and medium‐sized farms and those residing in the less developed central and western regions. Access to formal and informal credit affects mechanisation service expenditure differently. Specifically, accessing credit from formal sources (e.g., banks) significantly increases mechanisation service expenditure by 44.7 yuan/mu, while accessing credit from informal sources (e.g., friends and relatives) has no statistically significant effect on mechanisation service expenditure. Moreover, credit primarily intended for financing agricultural production significantly increases mechanisation service expenditure by 83.5 yuan/mu, whereas credit used mainly for non‐agricultural purposes significantly reduces such expenditure by 25.5 yuan/mu. These findings are further verified by estimating the effects of loan amounts on mechanisation service expenditure. Finally, we also investigate the nexus between mechanisation service adoption and farm performance, revealing that mechanisation service adoption increases crop yield by 12.6% and commercialisation by 77.4%, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.70072
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access to Credit and Mechanisation Service Expenditure: An Analysis Considering Access, Sources, Purposes and Amounts of Credit

Aya Suzuki, Xiance Sang, Hepei Zhang, Wanglin Ma
1 citations
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
3.13
article

Access to Credit and Mechanisation Service Expenditure: An Analysis Considering Access, Sources, Purposes and Amounts of Credit

Aya Suzuki, Xiance Sang, Hepei Zhang, Wanglin Ma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study estimates the impact of access to credit on mechanisation service expenditure by considering farmers' binary credit access decisions and distinguishing between formal and informal credit access. We employ a conditional mixed process model to address selection bias issues and use open‐access data from the Rural Development Institute at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (Beijing, China) through the 2020 China Rural Revitalization Survey. The theoretical analyses suggest that relaxing credit constraints enables farmers to achieve higher net returns by increasing all variable inputs, including farm machines, until they achieve the expected optimal level. The empirical results reveal that access to credit significantly increases mechanisation service expenditure by 115.5 yuan/mu, and the impact is larger on farmers cultivating small‐ and medium‐sized farms and those residing in the less developed central and western regions. Access to formal and informal credit affects mechanisation service expenditure differently. Specifically, accessing credit from formal sources (e.g., banks) significantly increases mechanisation service expenditure by 44.7 yuan/mu, while accessing credit from informal sources (e.g., friends and relatives) has no statistically significant effect on mechanisation service expenditure. Moreover, credit primarily intended for financing agricultural production significantly increases mechanisation service expenditure by 83.5 yuan/mu, whereas credit used mainly for non‐agricultural purposes significantly reduces such expenditure by 25.5 yuan/mu. These findings are further verified by estimating the effects of loan amounts on mechanisation service expenditure. Finally, we also investigate the nexus between mechanisation service adoption and farm performance, revealing that mechanisation service adoption increases crop yield by 12.6% and commercialisation by 77.4%, respectively.

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsVol. 70(1)
Lincoln University (NZ), Huazhong Agricultural University (CN), Gannan Medical University (CN), Gannan Normal University (CN), Jiangxi University of Science and Technology (CN), The University of Tokyo (JP), Tokyo International University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.