Decision tree-based approach to robust Parkinson's disease subtyping using clinical data of the Michael J. Fox Foundation LRRK2 cross-sectional study

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with high heterogeneity in clinical symptoms, progression course, treatment response, and genetic factors. Thus, PD subtyping aims to enhance understanding of disease mechanisms and helps to facilitate targeted interventions or treatment regimens. Data-driven PD subtyping is typically done using cluster analysis. Still, such studies face difficulty from widespread adoption in clinical practice due to the following issues: (i) results are quite sensitive to study design, and actual subtype rules are not reasonably interpretable; (ii) results are not robustly replicable across multiple datasets, and most studies focus on a single dataset. This paper aims to identify novel PD subtypes using an interpretable decision-tree-based method that is robustly reproducible in an independent PD cohort. We first train a decision tree classifier on an LRRK2 dataset to determine whether a patient has early onset or late onset PD. By tracing back from the leaves of the learned decision tree subtyping rules are established. The independent MDS dataset is used for external validation, after mapping features between the two datasets. We finally obtained six novel subtypes that are clinically consistent and sufficiently large across both training and external validation datasets. Finally, a clinical characterization study showed that the following clinical features may be the most important diagnostic markers for our six detected subtypes: (i) persistent asymmetry affecting the side of onset most, (ii) clinical course of 10 years or more, and (iii) postural instability not caused by other dysfunction. The subtypes identified in our study may provide relevant guidance for prognosis and therapeutic strategies. An early onset subtype (E4) can be linked to a comparatively favorable prognosis. In contrast, the mixed onset subtypes (M3 and M7) may predict faster functional decline, suggesting that patients in these groups could benefit from intensified supportive measures. One late onset subtype (L1) seems to have a more benign course, while the other two (L2 and L4) are connected with predictors of reduced quality of life and increased care dependency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1668206
Primary Topic
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision tree-based approach to robust Parkinson's disease subtyping using clinical data of the Michael J. Fox Foundation LRRK2 cross-sectional study

Dominik Wolff, Soumyadeep Roy, Michael Marschollek, Niloy Ganguly et al.
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
article

Decision tree-based approach to robust Parkinson's disease subtyping using clinical data of the Michael J. Fox Foundation LRRK2 cross-sectional study

Dominik Wolff, Soumyadeep Roy, Michael Marschollek, Niloy Ganguly, Helge Frieling, Stefanie Krähe
article en

Abstract

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with high heterogeneity in clinical symptoms, progression course, treatment response, and genetic factors. Thus, PD subtyping aims to enhance understanding of disease mechanisms and helps to facilitate targeted interventions or treatment regimens. Data-driven PD subtyping is typically done using cluster analysis. Still, such studies face difficulty from widespread adoption in clinical practice due to the following issues: (i) results are quite sensitive to study design, and actual subtype rules are not reasonably interpretable; (ii) results are not robustly replicable across multiple datasets, and most studies focus on a single dataset. This paper aims to identify novel PD subtypes using an interpretable decision-tree-based method that is robustly reproducible in an independent PD cohort. We first train a decision tree classifier on an LRRK2 dataset to determine whether a patient has early onset or late onset PD. By tracing back from the leaves of the learned decision tree subtyping rules are established. The independent MDS dataset is used for external validation, after mapping features between the two datasets. We finally obtained six novel subtypes that are clinically consistent and sufficiently large across both training and external validation datasets. Finally, a clinical characterization study showed that the following clinical features may be the most important diagnostic markers for our six detected subtypes: (i) persistent asymmetry affecting the side of onset most, (ii) clinical course of 10 years or more, and (iii) postural instability not caused by other dysfunction. The subtypes identified in our study may provide relevant guidance for prognosis and therapeutic strategies. An early onset subtype (E4) can be linked to a comparatively favorable prognosis. In contrast, the mixed onset subtypes (M3 and M7) may predict faster functional decline, suggesting that patients in these groups could benefit from intensified supportive measures. One late onset subtype (L1) seems to have a more benign course, while the other two (L2 and L4) are connected with predictors of reduced quality of life and increased care dependency.

Frontiers in Artificial IntelligenceVol. 8
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), L3S Research Center (DE), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.