Accounting for Impact: How Shipping Partnerships Drive e‐SDG Accountability for Climate Change Measures

ABSTRACT The literature addresses decarbonisation technologies and stakeholder engagement separately, without considering partnership practices, accountability frameworks and environmental performance measurement for environmentally Sustainable Development Goals (e‐SDGs) in shipping companies. This research gap is increasingly relevant given rising regulatory demands and stakeholder expectations on sustainability practices and disclosures. Unlike prior studies, this study examines how shipping companies adopt decarbonisation practices to advance e‐SDGs, with particular attention to SDG 17–Target 17.G, which promotes multi‐stakeholder partnerships. Emphasising the integration of carbon accounting and accountability systems, this study aims to assess and guide progress toward decarbonisation. Drawing on legitimacy, stakeholder and resource‐dependence theories, a two‐stage content analysis, automated (via Leximancer v.5) and manual, was conducted on sustainability reports and webpages published between 2018 and 2025 by 30 leading shipping companies, mainly from Asia, with smaller representation from Europe, the Middle East and North America. The results highlight an increasing reliance on cross‐sectoral partnerships that facilitate the sharing of resources and knowledge, supporting the adoption of low‐carbon technologies and enhancing compliance with international regulations such as the IMO decarbonisation strategy and the EU Emission Trading System. Carbon accounting emerges as a strategic tool for monitoring Scope 1–3 emissions and the recently discussed ‘avoided’ emissions, known as Scope 4, and for enhancing corporate transparency and accountability by integrating climate measures into strategic planning (SDG 13–Target 13.2). Overall, this study demonstrates that identifying and measuring the effects of cross‐sectoral partnerships is critical for researchers, industry practitioners and policymakers seeking to advance e‐SDGs in the maritime sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70341
Primary Topic
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accounting for Impact: How Shipping Partnerships Drive e‐SDG Accountability for Climate Change Measures

Assunta Di Vaio, Anum Zaffar, Giuseppe Nicolò, Elisa Van Engelenhoven
Business Strategy and the Environment
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
article

Accounting for Impact: How Shipping Partnerships Drive e‐SDG Accountability for Climate Change Measures

Assunta Di Vaio, Anum Zaffar, Giuseppe Nicolò, Elisa Van Engelenhoven
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The literature addresses decarbonisation technologies and stakeholder engagement separately, without considering partnership practices, accountability frameworks and environmental performance measurement for environmentally Sustainable Development Goals (e‐SDGs) in shipping companies. This research gap is increasingly relevant given rising regulatory demands and stakeholder expectations on sustainability practices and disclosures. Unlike prior studies, this study examines how shipping companies adopt decarbonisation practices to advance e‐SDGs, with particular attention to SDG 17–Target 17.G, which promotes multi‐stakeholder partnerships. Emphasising the integration of carbon accounting and accountability systems, this study aims to assess and guide progress toward decarbonisation. Drawing on legitimacy, stakeholder and resource‐dependence theories, a two‐stage content analysis, automated (via Leximancer v.5) and manual, was conducted on sustainability reports and webpages published between 2018 and 2025 by 30 leading shipping companies, mainly from Asia, with smaller representation from Europe, the Middle East and North America. The results highlight an increasing reliance on cross‐sectoral partnerships that facilitate the sharing of resources and knowledge, supporting the adoption of low‐carbon technologies and enhancing compliance with international regulations such as the IMO decarbonisation strategy and the EU Emission Trading System. Carbon accounting emerges as a strategic tool for monitoring Scope 1–3 emissions and the recently discussed ‘avoided’ emissions, known as Scope 4, and for enhancing corporate transparency and accountability by integrating climate measures into strategic planning (SDG 13–Target 13.2). Overall, this study demonstrates that identifying and measuring the effects of cross‐sectoral partnerships is critical for researchers, industry practitioners and policymakers seeking to advance e‐SDGs in the maritime sector.

Business Strategy and the EnvironmentVol. 35(3)
University of Salerno (IT), Parthenope University of Naples (IT), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.