Normative facets of transitioning food systems

Food systems are complex systems shaped by social, economic, political and environmental influences. The multi-level perspective (MLP), adopted from transition studies and examines system change as embedded in society, has been influential in food system studies. Yet its lack of normativity may limit its utility for guiding complex food system transitions. This paper proposes a conceptual framework that integrates normative directionality and interrelations of system transitions. The framework uses five analytical elements to identify system change dynamics: normative orientations, process drivers, emerging patterns, conflicts (trade-offs) and synergies. We interviewed Israeli food researchers and practitioners to examine normative orientations in Israel’s transition to a sustainable food system, unpacking its normative contestations, normative gaps, multi-directionalities, and normative stalemates. This paper then identifies conflicts and synergies in a broader set of normative goals explored in the study, and harnesses them towards more holistic food policymaking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1648446
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normative facets of transitioning food systems

Emily Soh, Elliot M. Berry, Eran Feitelson
1 citations
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
4.83
article

Normative facets of transitioning food systems

Emily Soh, Elliot M. Berry, Eran Feitelson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Food systems are complex systems shaped by social, economic, political and environmental influences. The multi-level perspective (MLP), adopted from transition studies and examines system change as embedded in society, has been influential in food system studies. Yet its lack of normativity may limit its utility for guiding complex food system transitions. This paper proposes a conceptual framework that integrates normative directionality and interrelations of system transitions. The framework uses five analytical elements to identify system change dynamics: normative orientations, process drivers, emerging patterns, conflicts (trade-offs) and synergies. We interviewed Israeli food researchers and practitioners to examine normative orientations in Israel’s transition to a sustainable food system, unpacking its normative contestations, normative gaps, multi-directionalities, and normative stalemates. This paper then identifies conflicts and synergies in a broader set of normative goals explored in the study, and harnesses them towards more holistic food policymaking.

Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsVol. 9
National University of Singapore (SG), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
4.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.