The effect of doping, anti-doping measures, and sociological factors on the annual distribution of all-time top performances in short, middle, and long-distance running

Scientific advancements, doping, anti-doping strategies, and sociological factors all influence athletic performance. This retrospective study aimed to analyze how different variables affect the annual distribution of all-time top performances from 1968-2023 in men's and women's running disciplines with different physiological demands (100 m-anaerobic, 5,000 m-aerobic, 800 m-mixed aerobic-anaerobic). A public database, https://www.alltime-athletics.com, with results linked to doping already excluded, was used. The annual distribution of top performances was modeled using negative binomial distribution to assess the influence of continuous and categorical variables, including doping availability (e.g., tetrahydrogestrinone, erythropoietin), anti-doping measures (e.g., Athlete Biological Passport modules, out-of-competition testing), and sociological factors (e.g., Olympic years). Steroid doping related variables showed significant effects on the annual distribution of top performances across almost all tested men's and women's disciplines, with a significant negative influence of testosterone limitations in women's 800 m, as well as a negative influence of the steroid module of the Athlete Biological Passport in women's 100 m and men's 800 m and 5,000 m disciplines. Blood doping related variables, including the positive influence of erythropoietin availability and the negative influence of the hematological module of the Athlete Biological Passport, demonstrated significant effects on performance in both 800 m disciplines. Olympic years emerged as a positive factor in the majority of tested disciplines, while the COVID-19 pandemic showed no significant influence. Despite strict anti-doping measures, our findings reveal a complex interaction of doping practices, regulatory frameworks, and social factors that continue to influence trends in elite athletic performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1683718
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Doping in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of doping, anti-doping measures, and sociological factors on the annual distribution of all-time top performances in short, middle, and long-distance running

Dora Dragčević, Delfa Radić-Krišto, Ozren Jakšić, Jelena Jaksic et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Doping in Sports
4.20
article

The effect of doping, anti-doping measures, and sociological factors on the annual distribution of all-time top performances in short, middle, and long-distance running

Dora Dragčević, Delfa Radić-Krišto, Ozren Jakšić, Jelena Jaksic, Lukas Libric, Ozana Jaksic, Vlatka Pandzic
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Scientific advancements, doping, anti-doping strategies, and sociological factors all influence athletic performance. This retrospective study aimed to analyze how different variables affect the annual distribution of all-time top performances from 1968-2023 in men's and women's running disciplines with different physiological demands (100 m-anaerobic, 5,000 m-aerobic, 800 m-mixed aerobic-anaerobic). A public database, https://www.alltime-athletics.com, with results linked to doping already excluded, was used. The annual distribution of top performances was modeled using negative binomial distribution to assess the influence of continuous and categorical variables, including doping availability (e.g., tetrahydrogestrinone, erythropoietin), anti-doping measures (e.g., Athlete Biological Passport modules, out-of-competition testing), and sociological factors (e.g., Olympic years). Steroid doping related variables showed significant effects on the annual distribution of top performances across almost all tested men's and women's disciplines, with a significant negative influence of testosterone limitations in women's 800 m, as well as a negative influence of the steroid module of the Athlete Biological Passport in women's 100 m and men's 800 m and 5,000 m disciplines. Blood doping related variables, including the positive influence of erythropoietin availability and the negative influence of the hematological module of the Athlete Biological Passport, demonstrated significant effects on performance in both 800 m disciplines. Olympic years emerged as a positive factor in the majority of tested disciplines, while the COVID-19 pandemic showed no significant influence. Despite strict anti-doping measures, our findings reveal a complex interaction of doping practices, regulatory frameworks, and social factors that continue to influence trends in elite athletic performance.

Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingVol. 7
University of Zagreb (HR), University Hospital Dubrava (HR), Klinička bolnica Merkur (HR), University of Osijek (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Doping in Sports
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.