Governing homelessness in the PRS: a capabilities perspective

The Private Rented Sector (PRS) occupies a complex position within local housing welfare systems. While PRS housing has provided an increasing resource for homelessness prevention activity, the notion of welfare is challenged through varied routes into housing benefit markets. This paper provides new theoretical and empirical insights to our understanding of the ethical legitimacy of PRS housing interventions in the governance of homelessness. By applying the lens of capabilities scholarship that is largely confined to congregate hostel accommodation, the article asks to what extent housing-led alternatives in the PRS can contribute to well-being for people experiencing homelessness and broader disadvantage. Drawing on interviews with commissioners and housing providers within a city-based case study, the article reveals how without effective mechanisms for identifying or responding to welfare needs, the precarity faced by some of the most disadvantaged people may be extended in the PRS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Housing Studies
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2025.2577723
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing homelessness in the PRS: a capabilities perspective

Emma Bimpson
Housing Studies
Homelessness and Social Issues
article

Governing homelessness in the PRS: a capabilities perspective

Emma Bimpson
article en

Abstract

The Private Rented Sector (PRS) occupies a complex position within local housing welfare systems. While PRS housing has provided an increasing resource for homelessness prevention activity, the notion of welfare is challenged through varied routes into housing benefit markets. This paper provides new theoretical and empirical insights to our understanding of the ethical legitimacy of PRS housing interventions in the governance of homelessness. By applying the lens of capabilities scholarship that is largely confined to congregate hostel accommodation, the article asks to what extent housing-led alternatives in the PRS can contribute to well-being for people experiencing homelessness and broader disadvantage. Drawing on interviews with commissioners and housing providers within a city-based case study, the article reveals how without effective mechanisms for identifying or responding to welfare needs, the precarity faced by some of the most disadvantaged people may be extended in the PRS.

Housing Studies
Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Homelessness and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.