A new modic changes classification and its impact on posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Current research on Modic Changes (MCs) in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) has predominantly focused on types 1, 2, and 3; however, findings remain inconsistent. To address this gap, we introduce a novel classification system based on endplate sclerosis status (sclerotic vs. non-sclerotic) to better evaluate the influence of MCs on PLIF outcomes. Patients were divided into Group A (normal endplates), Group B (MCs without endplate sclerosis), and Group C (MCs with endplate sclerosis), with fifty patients in each group. VAS and ODI scores were recorded preoperatively, postoperatively, and during follow-up to assess clinical outcomes. At least one year after surgery, CT scans were performed to evaluate postoperative cage subsidence and bony fusion. The postoperative cage subsidence rate recorded were 4% for Group A, 16% for Group B, and 2% for Group C, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The postoperative bony fusion rate were 98% for Group A, 96% for Group B, and 80% for Group C, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). At the final follow-up, the Visual Analog Scale(VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) scores in Group C were significantly higher than those in Groups A and B (P < 0.05), indicating worse clinical outcomes. MCs without endplate sclerosis increase the risk of cage subsidence after PLIF surgery but do not effect clinical outcomes. MCs with endplate sclerosis are associated with a reduced bony fusion rate following PLIF surgery, leading to worse long-term clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09332-1
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new modic changes classification and its impact on posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Xiaozhe Zhou, Xiaoxia Qiao, Xiong Zhang, Linfeng Wang
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

A new modic changes classification and its impact on posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Xiaozhe Zhou, Xiaoxia Qiao, Xiong Zhang, Linfeng Wang
article en

Abstract

Current research on Modic Changes (MCs) in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) has predominantly focused on types 1, 2, and 3; however, findings remain inconsistent. To address this gap, we introduce a novel classification system based on endplate sclerosis status (sclerotic vs. non-sclerotic) to better evaluate the influence of MCs on PLIF outcomes. Patients were divided into Group A (normal endplates), Group B (MCs without endplate sclerosis), and Group C (MCs with endplate sclerosis), with fifty patients in each group. VAS and ODI scores were recorded preoperatively, postoperatively, and during follow-up to assess clinical outcomes. At least one year after surgery, CT scans were performed to evaluate postoperative cage subsidence and bony fusion. The postoperative cage subsidence rate recorded were 4% for Group A, 16% for Group B, and 2% for Group C, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The postoperative bony fusion rate were 98% for Group A, 96% for Group B, and 80% for Group C, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). At the final follow-up, the Visual Analog Scale(VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) scores in Group C were significantly higher than those in Groups A and B (P < 0.05), indicating worse clinical outcomes. MCs without endplate sclerosis increase the risk of cage subsidence after PLIF surgery but do not effect clinical outcomes. MCs with endplate sclerosis are associated with a reduced bony fusion rate following PLIF surgery, leading to worse long-term clinical outcomes.

BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersVol. 26(1)
Hebei Medical University (CN), Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.