The association between medical students' learning resource usage and examination performance in an integrated Human Structure course

With many resources available, students may be unsure about which are most beneficial to aid learning of the anatomical sciences. The purpose of this study was to identify which learning resources medical students found most helpful and to examine the association between students' examination performance and their preferred study resources. In an IRB-approved study, students enrolled in an integrated Human Structure course from 2016 to 2022 were asked to list their preferred learning resources prior to the first examination. Resources identified as most helpful were extracted and similar resources were grouped into categories. Students were sorted into three groups based on examination performance. Chi-square tests of homogeneity were used to examine the association between students' examination performance and resource usage. The analysis included 2473 students: 393 high, 1701 average, and 379 low performers. Students identified eight categories of resources; self-assessment resources were most popular (59.5%) followed by lecture materials (53.3%). There was a steady increase in the use of self-assessment resources from year to year, and overall, fewer low performers (50.7%) used self-assessment resources than average (60.7%) and high performers (63.1%; p < 0.001). This suggests that low performers may be missing out on the feedback that self-assessment provides to identify gaps in their knowledge and to monitor their learning; without such feedback, struggling students may be unaware that their study strategies are ineffective for promoting deeper understanding and long-term retention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anatomical Sciences Education
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70157
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The association between medical students' learning resource usage and examination performance in an integrated Human Structure course

Leslie A. Hoffman, Andrew Cale, Margaret A. McNulty
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

The association between medical students' learning resource usage and examination performance in an integrated Human Structure course

Leslie A. Hoffman, Andrew Cale, Margaret A. McNulty
article en

Abstract

With many resources available, students may be unsure about which are most beneficial to aid learning of the anatomical sciences. The purpose of this study was to identify which learning resources medical students found most helpful and to examine the association between students' examination performance and their preferred study resources. In an IRB-approved study, students enrolled in an integrated Human Structure course from 2016 to 2022 were asked to list their preferred learning resources prior to the first examination. Resources identified as most helpful were extracted and similar resources were grouped into categories. Students were sorted into three groups based on examination performance. Chi-square tests of homogeneity were used to examine the association between students' examination performance and resource usage. The analysis included 2473 students: 393 high, 1701 average, and 379 low performers. Students identified eight categories of resources; self-assessment resources were most popular (59.5%) followed by lecture materials (53.3%). There was a steady increase in the use of self-assessment resources from year to year, and overall, fewer low performers (50.7%) used self-assessment resources than average (60.7%) and high performers (63.1%; p < 0.001). This suggests that low performers may be missing out on the feedback that self-assessment provides to identify gaps in their knowledge and to monitor their learning; without such feedback, struggling students may be unaware that their study strategies are ineffective for promoting deeper understanding and long-term retention.

Anatomical Sciences EducationVol. 19(3)
Indiana University Fort Wayne (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.