Time to Retire “Pedology”? Reflecting on Disciplinary Terminology in Soil Science

ABSTRACT The difference between “Pedology” and “Soil Science” is not simply a matter of terminology; it is fundamentally connected to how varied disciplines define their missions, address new emerging challenges, or interact within the scientific, socioeconomic, and cultural landscape at every level (regional, national, and international). This opinion paper aims to initiate a discussion on critically examining whether the continued parallel use of these two terms remains justified in the current scientific context. By considering both the historical context from which we come and future challenges, the article—while acknowledging the undeniable historical and conceptual value of “Pedology”—raises the issue of how its use can become limiting in an era marked by a growing drive toward interdisciplinary collaboration, multidisciplinarity, and ongoing technological innovation. The paper discusses, not claiming to possess the whole truth but simply aiming to open a broader debate, how the univocal adoption of “Soil Science” could serve as a unifying and accessible term, capable of (i) reflecting the current breadth and complexity of the discipline (from biochemical processes to landscape management, food security, and the crucial role of soils in combating climate change) and (ii) ensuring greater inclusiveness and communicative clarity for researchers, professionals, students, policymakers, and society as a whole. The article proposes a shift in language that aligns with current practices in major international journals, scientific societies, international calls, and educational settings at all levels. While honouring the undeniable pedological heritage of the past, such a shift would allow the soil science community to achieve greater recognition on the international stage. In this context, several recommendations are made to foster more balanced and future‐oriented terminology for a discipline at the crossroads of tradition and transformation. Without any claim to finality, the paper aims to foster an open and transparent dialogue, encouraging a broad and meaningful cultural debate.