The disclosure of potential conflicts of interest among editors and members of editorial boards in leading ethics journals

The findings indicate that disclosures of potential COIs by editors and editorial board members in leading ethics journals are often inconsistent and insufficient. Increasing transparency in this area could lead to a fairer and more trustworthy peer-review process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Integrity and Peer Review
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-025-00181-z
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The disclosure of potential conflicts of interest among editors and members of editorial boards in leading ethics journals

Clóvis Mariano Faggion
Research Integrity and Peer Review
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
article

The disclosure of potential conflicts of interest among editors and members of editorial boards in leading ethics journals

Clóvis Mariano Faggion
article en

Abstract

The findings indicate that disclosures of potential COIs by editors and editorial board members in leading ethics journals are often inconsistent and insufficient. Increasing transparency in this area could lead to a fairer and more trustworthy peer-review process.

Research Integrity and Peer ReviewVol. 10(1)
University Hospital Münster (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.