Epistemic reparations as social epistemic achievement

Abstract In this paper, I argue that epistemic reparations are complex social achievements. Previous accounts of epistemic reparations have failed to highlight the complex social nature of the epistemic goods that constitute epistemic reparations. To generate the knowledge required, a speaker must successfully communicate evaluatively robust content in a way that generates common knowledge. It is not sufficient for a speaker to offer information , they must generate knowledge . I argue that there are two conditions for a successful epistemic reparation: it must receive audience uptake , and it must generate a reparative response . Since most cases of egregious wrongdoing intersect with systematic oppression and active ignorance, the barriers to epistemic reparations are high. Epistemic reparations are achievements because of myriad barriers to successful uptake and response. This shows an additional value to epistemic reparations. Epistemic Reparations can serve as a work of epistemic justice by providing pinpricks of light in systems of epistemic oppression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Studies
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-025-02452-3
Primary Topic
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epistemic reparations as social epistemic achievement

A. K. Flowerree
Philosophical Studies
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
article

Epistemic reparations as social epistemic achievement

A. K. Flowerree
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, I argue that epistemic reparations are complex social achievements. Previous accounts of epistemic reparations have failed to highlight the complex social nature of the epistemic goods that constitute epistemic reparations. To generate the knowledge required, a speaker must successfully communicate evaluatively robust content in a way that generates common knowledge. It is not sufficient for a speaker to offer information , they must generate knowledge . I argue that there are two conditions for a successful epistemic reparation: it must receive audience uptake , and it must generate a reparative response . Since most cases of egregious wrongdoing intersect with systematic oppression and active ignorance, the barriers to epistemic reparations are high. Epistemic reparations are achievements because of myriad barriers to successful uptake and response. This shows an additional value to epistemic reparations. Epistemic Reparations can serve as a work of epistemic justice by providing pinpricks of light in systems of epistemic oppression.

Philosophical Studies
Texas Tech University (US), University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Epistemic reparations as social epistemic achievement — A. K. Flowerree · Philosophical Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS