Resistivity Change Mechanism in the Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Process

ABSTRACT This study explores the variation law, influencing factors, and mechanisms of resistivity in the interaction between CO₂ and saltwater. This study used a hollow PEEK conductor to simulate core pores. With excellent thermal stability, mechanical strength, and electrical insulation, its homogeneous, nonporous nature eliminates interference from rock properties, providing an ideal medium for studying pure fluid changes. The resistivity at different temperatures and pressures, and that of different fluids during the displacement process was experimentally measured. The results show that mineralization is the main factor affecting the resistivity, and the resistivity of formation water is reduced by 98.83–99.41% compared with that of deionized water under the same conditions. With the increase of temperature, the ion hydration effect weakens and increases the ion mobility rate, and the resistivity of various fluids decreases by 55.13–66.87%. The effect of pressure on resistivity is relatively weak, and the resistivity is reduced by approximately 2.29–11.08% by reducing the distance between ions and increasing the collision frequency between ions. However, in CO₂‐containing systems, increased pressure promotes CO₂ dissolution and ionization of more ions, which results in a larger decrease of 17.72–9.31%. It is particularly noteworthy that CO₂ dissolved in pure water reduces the resistivity by 91.50–94.50%, but when dissolved in formation water, the resistivity increases by 276.63–430.94%. Based on the ideal pore characteristics of the PEEK model, we fix the parameters (a, b, m, n) in the Archie formula to 1, and derive a simplified saturation model: Sw = Rw/(φRt). This achieves the quantitative representation of resistivity monitoring data into saturation distribution, improves the accuracy of calculating CO₂ saturation using resistivity data, and has important guiding significance for interpreting field monitoring data and evaluating CO₂ sequestration. Future research aims to translate these findings into practice using real rock cores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Science & Engineering
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70379
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resistivity Change Mechanism in the Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Process

Lihong Shi, Shijing Xu, Yunfei Lei, Changquan Wang et al.
Energy Science & Engineering
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Resistivity Change Mechanism in the Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Process

Lihong Shi, Shijing Xu, Yunfei Lei, Changquan Wang, Weijie Fu, Xinzhe Jin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explores the variation law, influencing factors, and mechanisms of resistivity in the interaction between CO₂ and saltwater. This study used a hollow PEEK conductor to simulate core pores. With excellent thermal stability, mechanical strength, and electrical insulation, its homogeneous, nonporous nature eliminates interference from rock properties, providing an ideal medium for studying pure fluid changes. The resistivity at different temperatures and pressures, and that of different fluids during the displacement process was experimentally measured. The results show that mineralization is the main factor affecting the resistivity, and the resistivity of formation water is reduced by 98.83–99.41% compared with that of deionized water under the same conditions. With the increase of temperature, the ion hydration effect weakens and increases the ion mobility rate, and the resistivity of various fluids decreases by 55.13–66.87%. The effect of pressure on resistivity is relatively weak, and the resistivity is reduced by approximately 2.29–11.08% by reducing the distance between ions and increasing the collision frequency between ions. However, in CO₂‐containing systems, increased pressure promotes CO₂ dissolution and ionization of more ions, which results in a larger decrease of 17.72–9.31%. It is particularly noteworthy that CO₂ dissolved in pure water reduces the resistivity by 91.50–94.50%, but when dissolved in formation water, the resistivity increases by 276.63–430.94%. Based on the ideal pore characteristics of the PEEK model, we fix the parameters (a, b, m, n) in the Archie formula to 1, and derive a simplified saturation model: Sw = Rw/(φRt). This achieves the quantitative representation of resistivity monitoring data into saturation distribution, improves the accuracy of calculating CO₂ saturation using resistivity data, and has important guiding significance for interpreting field monitoring data and evaluating CO₂ sequestration. Future research aims to translate these findings into practice using real rock cores.

Energy Science & EngineeringVol. 14(2)
Yangtze University (CN), Nano Carbon (Poland) (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.