Highly variable light attenuation across a gneiss rock wall in eastern Greenland

Exposure ages and erosion rates determined using rock surface luminescence has the potential to revolutionalise Quaternary Scicence. However, accurately quantifying μ (the light attenuation coefficient) is a significant challenge. Our study shows how variable light attenuation properties (i.e. μ) can be for five samples taken from a small (423 m) elevation range of a near-vertical gneiss rock wall, which we would have expected to have had a shared μ value. The light attenuation properties varied on multiple scales: (i) between samples; (ii) between replicate cores; and (iii) between slices within a core. To avoid between sample variability, we need to either measure μ directly from the rock cores used to derive the exposure age or erosion rate, or prove that these samples and the sample used to calibrate μ have identical light attenuation properties. To avoid variability between replicate cores observed in samples, it may be more accurate to derive exposure ages or erosion rates using a single core with identical light attenuation properties to the sample used to calibrate μ. Finally, where possible, we should avoid rocks that have hetergeneous mixes of minerals with different opacities (lighter and darker). However, if it is not possible, we should routinely measure red-green-blue (RGB) values to link the presence of any low datapoints in the luminescence depth profiles to overlying lighter-coloured minerals that could have caused light ‘piping’. Our findings further emphasise the detailed consideration required for deriving μ to determine accurate exposure ages and erosion rates. • Samples from single gneiss rock wall across elevation range of only 423 m. • IR 50 signal bleaching front not deeper than pIRIR signals for the lighter coloured rocks. • Variable light attenuation between samples restricts calibration of μ. • Variable light attenuation between replicate cores introduces uncertainty. • Preferential bleaching of slices caused by light ‘piping’ of overlying lighter minerals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Measurements
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2025.107568
Primary Topic
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Highly variable light attenuation across a gneiss rock wall in eastern Greenland

Rachel Smedley, M. R. Hudec R. C. Fletcher, Heïdi Sevestre, Anthony Kane et al.
Radiation Measurements
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
article

Highly variable light attenuation across a gneiss rock wall in eastern Greenland

Rachel Smedley, M. R. Hudec R. C. Fletcher, Heïdi Sevestre, Anthony Kane, Alex Honnold
article en

Abstract

Exposure ages and erosion rates determined using rock surface luminescence has the potential to revolutionalise Quaternary Scicence. However, accurately quantifying μ (the light attenuation coefficient) is a significant challenge. Our study shows how variable light attenuation properties (i.e. μ) can be for five samples taken from a small (423 m) elevation range of a near-vertical gneiss rock wall, which we would have expected to have had a shared μ value. The light attenuation properties varied on multiple scales: (i) between samples; (ii) between replicate cores; and (iii) between slices within a core. To avoid between sample variability, we need to either measure μ directly from the rock cores used to derive the exposure age or erosion rate, or prove that these samples and the sample used to calibrate μ have identical light attenuation properties. To avoid variability between replicate cores observed in samples, it may be more accurate to derive exposure ages or erosion rates using a single core with identical light attenuation properties to the sample used to calibrate μ. Finally, where possible, we should avoid rocks that have hetergeneous mixes of minerals with different opacities (lighter and darker). However, if it is not possible, we should routinely measure red-green-blue (RGB) values to link the presence of any low datapoints in the luminescence depth profiles to overlying lighter-coloured minerals that could have caused light ‘piping’. Our findings further emphasise the detailed consideration required for deriving μ to determine accurate exposure ages and erosion rates. • Samples from single gneiss rock wall across elevation range of only 423 m. • IR 50 signal bleaching front not deeper than pIRIR signals for the lighter coloured rocks. • Variable light attenuation between samples restricts calibration of μ. • Variable light attenuation between replicate cores introduces uncertainty. • Preferential bleaching of slices caused by light ‘piping’ of overlying lighter minerals.

Radiation MeasurementsVol. 190
University of Liverpool (GB), Arctic Research Centre (SE), Arctic Monitoring And Assessment Programme (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.