Association of tumor markers CA 15-3, CEA, and CA 125 with [18F]NaF PET findings in breast cancer patients

Elevated CA 15-3 and CEA independently predict [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET positivity in breast cancer. Optimal cut-offs were 19.25 U/mL for CA 15-3 (sensitivity 70.1%, specificity 90.4%, LR + 7.38, AUC 0.837) and 3.15 ng/mL for CEA (sensitivity 65.6%, specificity 85.2%, LR + 4.43, AUC 0.821). The clinical utility of CA 15-3 and CEA lies in rule-in and risk-stratification strategies. Patients above these thresholds, particularly those with invasive lobular carcinoma undergoing restaging, may benefit from prioritized [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET evaluation or improved interpretation of equivocal PET findings. CA 15-3 threshold, lower than routine laboratory reference, may guide aggressive screening and prioritized [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET in patients with high clinical suspicion. Multivariable model combining CA 15-3, CEA, and CA 125 (probability cut-off 0.29) improved diagnostic performance (sensitivity 79.7%, specificity 92.3%, AUC 0.863). Integrating CA 15-3 and CEA into clinical decision-making may enable a nuanced, risk-adapted approach, optimizing metastasis detection and resource allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1673504
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of tumor markers CA 15-3, CEA, and CA 125 with [18F]NaF PET findings in breast cancer patients

Farzad Abbaspour, Sara Harsini, Gad Abikhzer, Shawn Karls et al.
Frontiers in Oncology
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Association of tumor markers CA 15-3, CEA, and CA 125 with [18F]NaF PET findings in breast cancer patients

Farzad Abbaspour, Sara Harsini, Gad Abikhzer, Shawn Karls, Vilma Derbekyan, Arvin Naeimi, Marc Hickeson
article en

Abstract

Elevated CA 15-3 and CEA independently predict [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET positivity in breast cancer. Optimal cut-offs were 19.25 U/mL for CA 15-3 (sensitivity 70.1%, specificity 90.4%, LR + 7.38, AUC 0.837) and 3.15 ng/mL for CEA (sensitivity 65.6%, specificity 85.2%, LR + 4.43, AUC 0.821). The clinical utility of CA 15-3 and CEA lies in rule-in and risk-stratification strategies. Patients above these thresholds, particularly those with invasive lobular carcinoma undergoing restaging, may benefit from prioritized [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET evaluation or improved interpretation of equivocal PET findings. CA 15-3 threshold, lower than routine laboratory reference, may guide aggressive screening and prioritized [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET in patients with high clinical suspicion. Multivariable model combining CA 15-3, CEA, and CA 125 (probability cut-off 0.29) improved diagnostic performance (sensitivity 79.7%, specificity 92.3%, AUC 0.863). Integrating CA 15-3 and CEA into clinical decision-making may enable a nuanced, risk-adapted approach, optimizing metastasis detection and resource allocation.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 15
BC Cancer Agency (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Guilan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Ottawa Hospital (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Jewish General Hospital (CA), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.