Declining medical student attendance: a single institution thematic analysis of reasons students don't attend a preclinical public health course

Declining medical student attendance has been noted for decades, becoming particularly challenging in the years surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. The reasons why medical students have not attended class in the years since the pandemic and the transition of USMLE Step 1 scores to Pass/Fail are not well established. This study evaluated why medical students did not attend a preclinical public health course. A secondary aim is to compare trends in self-reported attendance. Student course evaluations include self-reported attendance and free-text responses to 'Why did you choose not to attend live sessions more often?' Using inductive thematic analysis, faculty reviewers identified themes affecting attendance. The median self-reported attendance each year for first-year (MS1) and second-year (MS2) students was calculated and analyzed between 2018 and 2023. The overall evaluation response rate was 75.3% for MS1 and 59.3% for MS2. Five non-attendance themes emerged: academic schedule, learning style/delivery, content not valued, convenience/efficiency, and personal conflicts. MS2 attendance was significantly lower than MS1 attendance (<i>p</i> = 0.0227). Attendance varied significantly over time for both MS1 and MS2. MS1 had the highest percentage in 2018, which subsequently declined, with a nadir in 2021 (57.1%), before increasing again in 2022 (72.3%) and 2023 (75.9%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A similar pattern was observed for MS2 (<i>p</i> = 0.019), though with less rebound. Medical educators can adjust schedules and vary content delivery to impact some identified themes. Other themes, including convenience/efficiency and personal obligations, are more complex for educators to impact. Non-attendance is a multifaceted problem that escalated during the pandemic. MS2 visits rebounded less after the pandemic than for MS1. Step 1 grading changed during that time and may have played a role in attendance. This study adds to the sparse literature describing why MS1 and MS2 do not attend class. The identified themes provide a framework for further study. The effect of changing Step 1 scoring warrants further study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Education Online
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2587387
Primary Topic
Innovations in Educational Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Declining medical student attendance: a single institution thematic analysis of reasons students don't attend a preclinical public health course

Karla S. Bartholomew, Stephanie L. Sarandos, Jillian S. Catalanotti, Grace Truong et al.
Medical Education Online
Innovations in Educational Methods
article

Declining medical student attendance: a single institution thematic analysis of reasons students don't attend a preclinical public health course

Karla S. Bartholomew, Stephanie L. Sarandos, Jillian S. Catalanotti, Grace Truong, Caroline Bockus, Kathryn Binney
article en

Abstract

Declining medical student attendance has been noted for decades, becoming particularly challenging in the years surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. The reasons why medical students have not attended class in the years since the pandemic and the transition of USMLE Step 1 scores to Pass/Fail are not well established. This study evaluated why medical students did not attend a preclinical public health course. A secondary aim is to compare trends in self-reported attendance. Student course evaluations include self-reported attendance and free-text responses to 'Why did you choose not to attend live sessions more often?' Using inductive thematic analysis, faculty reviewers identified themes affecting attendance. The median self-reported attendance each year for first-year (MS1) and second-year (MS2) students was calculated and analyzed between 2018 and 2023. The overall evaluation response rate was 75.3% for MS1 and 59.3% for MS2. Five non-attendance themes emerged: academic schedule, learning style/delivery, content not valued, convenience/efficiency, and personal conflicts. MS2 attendance was significantly lower than MS1 attendance (<i>p</i> = 0.0227). Attendance varied significantly over time for both MS1 and MS2. MS1 had the highest percentage in 2018, which subsequently declined, with a nadir in 2021 (57.1%), before increasing again in 2022 (72.3%) and 2023 (75.9%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A similar pattern was observed for MS2 (<i>p</i> = 0.019), though with less rebound. Medical educators can adjust schedules and vary content delivery to impact some identified themes. Other themes, including convenience/efficiency and personal obligations, are more complex for educators to impact. Non-attendance is a multifaceted problem that escalated during the pandemic. MS2 visits rebounded less after the pandemic than for MS1. Step 1 grading changed during that time and may have played a role in attendance. This study adds to the sparse literature describing why MS1 and MS2 do not attend class. The identified themes provide a framework for further study. The effect of changing Step 1 scoring warrants further study.

Medical Education OnlineVol. 30(1)
George Washington University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Innovations in Educational Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.