Why are group chats so toxic?: A view from cognitive ecology

There is hardly any form of social media interaction more inflammatory and emotionally distressing than the so-called online group chats reportedly associated with such negative experiences as anxiety, hate speech, violence and even homicide. Adopting a cognitive ecolinguistic approach, we view an act of media use as a functional systemic unity between the media user's bodily “ways of meaning” and the affordable environmental resources on which she draws in these ways for meaning to emerge. As human ways of meaning are based on skillful enactment of mutually orientational behaviors across timescales, everything that a media user does is in and through language. The problem arises when such doings fail to be properly distinguished, namely, the two ontologically different and semiotically autonomous activities – those of text(ing) and talk – become enmeshed. We argue that the colloquial term ‘group chat’ is a complete misnomer for what (corpo)really happens in every act of media use because the user interacts with the digital technology rather than with the help of it. While natural group chat is a locally constrained and emplaced mutually orientational behavior, virtual group messaging is a technologically constrained realization of literacy skills by a media user who imagines/assumes the others to exist in a certain way and place. Semiotically, when we engage with the group via messaging, we are texting instead of talking. To think that we are talking through texting or that we are texting as if talking is a fallacy that results in a dysfunctional human-environment cognitive ecology. • As an ecological being, a media user draws on her cultural-technological environment to enlarge her participatory experiences beyond it. • As an operationally closed organism, a media user can only operate within her cognitive boundaries beyond which nothing exists. • Natural group chat is an observable coordination of co-present behaviors and situational resources. • Virtual group chat is an abstract totality of non-observable literacy-based technological practices at unspecified times and places. • In the semiotic reality of instant messaging neither group exists nor chatting happens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Sciences
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2025.101776
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why are group chats so toxic?: A view from cognitive ecology

Andrey S. Druzhinin, Diego Ramírez-Lovering
Language Sciences
Digital Communication and Language
article

Why are group chats so toxic?: A view from cognitive ecology

Andrey S. Druzhinin, Diego Ramírez-Lovering
article en

Abstract

There is hardly any form of social media interaction more inflammatory and emotionally distressing than the so-called online group chats reportedly associated with such negative experiences as anxiety, hate speech, violence and even homicide. Adopting a cognitive ecolinguistic approach, we view an act of media use as a functional systemic unity between the media user's bodily “ways of meaning” and the affordable environmental resources on which she draws in these ways for meaning to emerge. As human ways of meaning are based on skillful enactment of mutually orientational behaviors across timescales, everything that a media user does is in and through language. The problem arises when such doings fail to be properly distinguished, namely, the two ontologically different and semiotically autonomous activities – those of text(ing) and talk – become enmeshed. We argue that the colloquial term ‘group chat’ is a complete misnomer for what (corpo)really happens in every act of media use because the user interacts with the digital technology rather than with the help of it. While natural group chat is a locally constrained and emplaced mutually orientational behavior, virtual group messaging is a technologically constrained realization of literacy skills by a media user who imagines/assumes the others to exist in a certain way and place. Semiotically, when we engage with the group via messaging, we are texting instead of talking. To think that we are talking through texting or that we are texting as if talking is a fallacy that results in a dysfunctional human-environment cognitive ecology. • As an ecological being, a media user draws on her cultural-technological environment to enlarge her participatory experiences beyond it. • As an operationally closed organism, a media user can only operate within her cognitive boundaries beyond which nothing exists. • Natural group chat is an observable coordination of co-present behaviors and situational resources. • Virtual group chat is an abstract totality of non-observable literacy-based technological practices at unspecified times and places. • In the semiotic reality of instant messaging neither group exists nor chatting happens.

Language SciencesVol. 113
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (RU), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Digital Communication and Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.