Enhancing multiple ecosystem services: Nature-based measures outperform technical interventions in river management

• 20 key ecosystem services in riverine landscapes summarized. • Nature-based measures benefits up to 17 ecosystem services, outweighing technical measures. • Technical measures tend to prioritize a single ecosystem service at the cost of multiple others. • Prioritizing nature-based measures fosters multifunctional, sustainable river systems. • Future research should bridge evidence gaps with more empirical studies and data synthesis. While rivers and floodplains provide critical ecosystem services such as water purification, flood regulation, and recreational opportunities, they face increasing pressures from anthropogenic activities and climate change. Traditional river management has predominantly relied on technical interventions, which have frequently been associated with reductions in the ability of ecosystems to deliver these critical services. This study aims to provide a robust basis for assessing the potential impacts of technical and nature-based river management measures on ecosystem services in rivers and floodplains. Using a synthesis-of-reviews approach based on PRISMA guidelines findings from nine review publications – including 25 nature-based and 26 technical river management measures – were summarized. Results demonstrate that nature-based river management measures exhibit significantly more positive and fewer negative effects on ecosystem services compared to technical measures. Over 84 % (21 out of 25) of nature-based interventions positively influence 6 to 17 ecosystem services, whereas technical measures, on average, positively affect only one service (±1.4 standard deviation, SD) and negatively impact approximately 15 (±5.3 SD). Nature-based measures also enhance ecological integrity, biodiversity, and climate resilience, making them critical for achieving multifunctional river landscapes. These findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners, emphasizing the need to prioritize nature-based measures in river management to enhance ecological conditions and sustain multiple ecosystem services. By integrating nature-based approaches, decision-makers can achieve more sustainable, multifunctional river systems that balance ecological, social, and economic objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystem Services
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101795
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing multiple ecosystem services: Nature-based measures outperform technical interventions in river management

Christian Albert, Stefan Schmidt
2 citations
Ecosystem Services
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
3.43
article

Enhancing multiple ecosystem services: Nature-based measures outperform technical interventions in river management

Christian Albert, Stefan Schmidt
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• 20 key ecosystem services in riverine landscapes summarized. • Nature-based measures benefits up to 17 ecosystem services, outweighing technical measures. • Technical measures tend to prioritize a single ecosystem service at the cost of multiple others. • Prioritizing nature-based measures fosters multifunctional, sustainable river systems. • Future research should bridge evidence gaps with more empirical studies and data synthesis. While rivers and floodplains provide critical ecosystem services such as water purification, flood regulation, and recreational opportunities, they face increasing pressures from anthropogenic activities and climate change. Traditional river management has predominantly relied on technical interventions, which have frequently been associated with reductions in the ability of ecosystems to deliver these critical services. This study aims to provide a robust basis for assessing the potential impacts of technical and nature-based river management measures on ecosystem services in rivers and floodplains. Using a synthesis-of-reviews approach based on PRISMA guidelines findings from nine review publications – including 25 nature-based and 26 technical river management measures – were summarized. Results demonstrate that nature-based river management measures exhibit significantly more positive and fewer negative effects on ecosystem services compared to technical measures. Over 84 % (21 out of 25) of nature-based interventions positively influence 6 to 17 ecosystem services, whereas technical measures, on average, positively affect only one service (±1.4 standard deviation, SD) and negatively impact approximately 15 (±5.3 SD). Nature-based measures also enhance ecological integrity, biodiversity, and climate resilience, making them critical for achieving multifunctional river landscapes. These findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners, emphasizing the need to prioritize nature-based measures in river management to enhance ecological conditions and sustain multiple ecosystem services. By integrating nature-based approaches, decision-makers can achieve more sustainable, multifunctional river systems that balance ecological, social, and economic objectives.

Ecosystem ServicesVol. 76
Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.