The Tip of the Iceberg: Reading Practices in Mary Hamilton's Archive, 1783–1784

Abstract This article evaluates the benefits and drawbacks of using quantitative digital analysis to reconstruct eighteenth‐century reading practices using manuscript life writing. Our corpus is over a thousand pages of Mary Hamilton's letters and diary entries covering one year of her life. We report significant findings concerning the space, time, nature, and mode of Hamilton's reading, and the media, genre, authorship, and provenance of her material. Her reading diet is more dominated by female‐authored manuscript prose, inflected by personal acquaintance, and reliant on a private loan economy than we anticipated — conclusions that we would not have reached using qualitative analysis alone.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-0208.70010
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Tip of the Iceberg: Reading Practices in Mary Hamilton's Archive, 1783–1784

Sophie Coulombeau, Cassandra Ulph
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

The Tip of the Iceberg: Reading Practices in Mary Hamilton's Archive, 1783–1784

Sophie Coulombeau, Cassandra Ulph
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article evaluates the benefits and drawbacks of using quantitative digital analysis to reconstruct eighteenth‐century reading practices using manuscript life writing. Our corpus is over a thousand pages of Mary Hamilton's letters and diary entries covering one year of her life. We report significant findings concerning the space, time, nature, and mode of Hamilton's reading, and the media, genre, authorship, and provenance of her material. Her reading diet is more dominated by female‐authored manuscript prose, inflected by personal acquaintance, and reliant on a private loan economy than we anticipated — conclusions that we would not have reached using qualitative analysis alone.

Journal for Eighteenth-Century StudiesVol. 48(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.