Meritocracy meets cooperative behavior in redistribution decisions

The paper studies redistributive choices and tests the trade-off between a meritocratic ideal and the willingness to reward cooperation. We design an online experiment that collects information on real redistribution in favor of subjects that differ in relative performance and cooperative levels. Cooperative behavior plays a major role in making people “deserve” redistribution; furthermore, redistribution to reward cooperation is influenced by the subjects’ income. To quantify the weight of cooperative behavior in redistribution, we present a model and structurally estimate its parameters. We find that a percentage between 37% and 56% of total redistribution is driven by cooperation-related concerns. • we conduct an online experiment on a representative sample of Italian respondents • we test whether respondents reward others based on productivity or cooperation • we estimate the parameters of a structural model to quantify social preferences • we find that responds depart from choices remunerating merit only • respondents expect higher cooperation from richer subjects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2025.102485
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meritocracy meets cooperative behavior in redistribution decisions

Cristina Cattaneo, Claudio Daminato, Daniela Grieco
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Meritocracy meets cooperative behavior in redistribution decisions

Cristina Cattaneo, Claudio Daminato, Daniela Grieco
article en

Abstract

The paper studies redistributive choices and tests the trade-off between a meritocratic ideal and the willingness to reward cooperation. We design an online experiment that collects information on real redistribution in favor of subjects that differ in relative performance and cooperative levels. Cooperative behavior plays a major role in making people “deserve” redistribution; furthermore, redistribution to reward cooperation is influenced by the subjects’ income. To quantify the weight of cooperative behavior in redistribution, we present a model and structurally estimate its parameters. We find that a percentage between 37% and 56% of total redistribution is driven by cooperation-related concerns. • we conduct an online experiment on a representative sample of Italian respondents • we test whether respondents reward others based on productivity or cooperation • we estimate the parameters of a structural model to quantify social preferences • we find that responds depart from choices remunerating merit only • respondents expect higher cooperation from richer subjects.

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental EconomicsVol. 120
Lund University (SE), University of Milan (IT), RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (IT)
Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione Cariplo
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Meritocracy meets cooperative behavior in redistribution decisions — Cristina Cattaneo, Claudio Daminato, et al. · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS