Out of gratification or fears? A dual model to explore drivers of generative artificial intelligence adoption

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative force reshaping how individuals work, live, and interact with their environments. Despite its rapid diffusion, research has yet to clarify the psychological mechanisms driving individual-level GenAI adoption and resistance. This study addresses this critical gap by proposing a dual-path model grounded in Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT) and an extended Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) framework. UGT explains the positive, need-fulfilling motivations for GenAI use, incorporating novel gratification constructs such as serendipity, perceived diagnosticity, tangibility, curiosity fulfillment, and enjoyment. In contrast, the enhanced PMT framework captures both traditional and extended pathways of perceived threats. By including fear of losing power (FLP) and fear of missing out (FoMO) as internal psychological mechanisms, this study offers a more comprehensive account of GenAI adoption and resistance. Trait competitiveness and AI self-efficacy are introduced as moderators, delineating how individual differences shape protective responses. Using data from a two-wave longitudinal survey of 1271 ChatGPT users, the findings reveal that UGT-related factors primarily drive adoption, while traditional and extended PMT factors explain resistance behaviors. Notably, FoMO functions as a dual-pathway factor, facilitating adoption and mitigating resistance. Trait competitiveness and AI self-efficacy demonstrate partial moderating effects, underscoring the role of personal dispositions in shaping user behavior. This study contributes theoretically by integrating positive gratification and protective aversion into a unified model of GenAI use. Practically, it provides actionable insights for designing adaptive, user-centered AI systems that enhance engagement while reducing resistance. • We propose a dual-model framework combining UGT and PMT for GenAI adoption. • We introduce novel constructs like serendipity and fear of missing out in GenAI adoption. • We conduct a longitudinal study of 1271 ChatGPT users to test our hypotheses. • UGT factors drive adoption, while PMT factors influence resistance. • Trait competitiveness and AI self-efficacy partially moderate the proposed relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology in Society
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103177
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Out of gratification or fears? A dual model to explore drivers of generative artificial intelligence adoption

Chien Hsiang Liao, Yu‐Hui Fang, Chia‐Ying Li
Technology in Society
AI in Service Interactions
article

Out of gratification or fears? A dual model to explore drivers of generative artificial intelligence adoption

Chien Hsiang Liao, Yu‐Hui Fang, Chia‐Ying Li
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative force reshaping how individuals work, live, and interact with their environments. Despite its rapid diffusion, research has yet to clarify the psychological mechanisms driving individual-level GenAI adoption and resistance. This study addresses this critical gap by proposing a dual-path model grounded in Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT) and an extended Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) framework. UGT explains the positive, need-fulfilling motivations for GenAI use, incorporating novel gratification constructs such as serendipity, perceived diagnosticity, tangibility, curiosity fulfillment, and enjoyment. In contrast, the enhanced PMT framework captures both traditional and extended pathways of perceived threats. By including fear of losing power (FLP) and fear of missing out (FoMO) as internal psychological mechanisms, this study offers a more comprehensive account of GenAI adoption and resistance. Trait competitiveness and AI self-efficacy are introduced as moderators, delineating how individual differences shape protective responses. Using data from a two-wave longitudinal survey of 1271 ChatGPT users, the findings reveal that UGT-related factors primarily drive adoption, while traditional and extended PMT factors explain resistance behaviors. Notably, FoMO functions as a dual-pathway factor, facilitating adoption and mitigating resistance. Trait competitiveness and AI self-efficacy demonstrate partial moderating effects, underscoring the role of personal dispositions in shaping user behavior. This study contributes theoretically by integrating positive gratification and protective aversion into a unified model of GenAI use. Practically, it provides actionable insights for designing adaptive, user-centered AI systems that enhance engagement while reducing resistance. • We propose a dual-model framework combining UGT and PMT for GenAI adoption. • We introduce novel constructs like serendipity and fear of missing out in GenAI adoption. • We conduct a longitudinal study of 1271 ChatGPT users to test our hypotheses. • UGT factors drive adoption, while PMT factors influence resistance. • Trait competitiveness and AI self-efficacy partially moderate the proposed relationships.

Technology in SocietyVol. 85
Tamkang University (TW), Fu Jen Catholic University (TW), National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.