Who Believes the Myths? Educator Misconceptions About Giftedness Across Roles, Training, and Experience

Despite growing research in gifted education, myths about giftedness remain widespread among educators and may hinder appropriate support for gifted learners. In this study, data were collected from 562 participants (60.7% female, 39.3% male), including preservice teachers, in-service teachers, and university lecturers in teacher education, using the newly developed, psychometrically validated the Rapid Assessment Test of Individual Misconceptions about Giftedness (RATIMAG) instrument. This study aimed to investigate how demographic variables affect educators’ beliefs about myths about giftedness. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests revealed significant group differences based on age, education level, academic department, training in gifted education, and occupational role. Gender was not associated with belief differences. Findings emphasize the importance of sustained, role-sensitive training throughout the educator career cycle. While conducted in Türkiye, the study raises broader questions about the persistence of giftedness myths across cultures and suggests directions for improving educator preparation and policy in gifted education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gifted Education International
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294251400182
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Believes the Myths? Educator Misconceptions About Giftedness Across Roles, Training, and Experience

Albert Ziegler, Merve Irem Ercan
1 citations
Gifted Education International
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
2.12
article

Who Believes the Myths? Educator Misconceptions About Giftedness Across Roles, Training, and Experience

Albert Ziegler, Merve Irem Ercan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite growing research in gifted education, myths about giftedness remain widespread among educators and may hinder appropriate support for gifted learners. In this study, data were collected from 562 participants (60.7% female, 39.3% male), including preservice teachers, in-service teachers, and university lecturers in teacher education, using the newly developed, psychometrically validated the Rapid Assessment Test of Individual Misconceptions about Giftedness (RATIMAG) instrument. This study aimed to investigate how demographic variables affect educators’ beliefs about myths about giftedness. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests revealed significant group differences based on age, education level, academic department, training in gifted education, and occupational role. Gender was not associated with belief differences. Findings emphasize the importance of sustained, role-sensitive training throughout the educator career cycle. While conducted in Türkiye, the study raises broader questions about the persistence of giftedness myths across cultures and suggests directions for improving educator preparation and policy in gifted education.

Gifted Education International
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.