Applying Precautions in Target Verification with AI Decision Support Systems

Abstract This article examines how the obligation to take precautionary measures to verify targets under international humanitarian law (IHL) can be applied with artificial intelligence decision support systems (AI-DSS). It uses the reported deployment of systems like ‘Lavender’ and ‘Where's Daddy?’ by Israel in the Gaza War as an illustrative example, breaks down the use of AI-DSS into stages – legal qualification, classification, and identification/location – and evaluates how precautions to verify can reduce the risk of false positives in each of these stages. It argues that precautions to verify must be applied at all stages, and discusses factors that affect their feasibility. The article concludes that while human oversight remains essential, precautions specific to AI-DSS outside the realm of the human operator are possible, and at times, necessary to ensure compliance with IHL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Israel Law Review
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021223725100071
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying Precautions in Target Verification with AI Decision Support Systems

R. Wolf
Israel Law Review
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Applying Precautions in Target Verification with AI Decision Support Systems

R. Wolf
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how the obligation to take precautionary measures to verify targets under international humanitarian law (IHL) can be applied with artificial intelligence decision support systems (AI-DSS). It uses the reported deployment of systems like ‘Lavender’ and ‘Where's Daddy?’ by Israel in the Gaza War as an illustrative example, breaks down the use of AI-DSS into stages – legal qualification, classification, and identification/location – and evaluates how precautions to verify can reduce the risk of false positives in each of these stages. It argues that precautions to verify must be applied at all stages, and discusses factors that affect their feasibility. The article concludes that while human oversight remains essential, precautions specific to AI-DSS outside the realm of the human operator are possible, and at times, necessary to ensure compliance with IHL.

Israel Law ReviewVol. 58(2-3)
The University of Queensland (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Arizona State University, University of New South Wales
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.