A systematic review of psychosocial hazard management across the emergency services sector

Emergency Service workers face many challenges that impact their mental health and well-being. Of particular concern are psychosocial hazards (e.g., high job demands, exposure to traumatic events, low job control, poor supervisor support, violence, bullying, harassment). Research demonstrates psychosocial hazards are problematic, however, little is known about how they are currently managed in Emergency Services. This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate (1) workplace psychosocial hazard management interventions, (2) intervention effectiveness, and (3) barriers to implementation in the Emergency Services sector. A search of five databases, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and PubMed, identified 13 studies that met inclusion criteria. Quality assessment involved Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal tools. Findings revealed interventions were predominantly reactive (e.g., support provided post-incident) rather than proactive. Interventions included peer support, mental health programs, leadership training, and workplace adjustments (e.g., shift schedule changes, structured downtime). Peer support and leadership training improved mental health awareness and access to mental health resources. Proactive interventions (e.g., shift schedule changes) were associated with improved work-life balance, job satisfaction and improved psychosocial well-being (e.g., reduced burnout and job strain). However, barriers (e.g., stigma, resource constraints) adversely impacted successful implementation. Future research should explore the development of interventions that prioritise preventative factors (e.g., increasing supervisor support, workload adjustments) as part of daily operations. A psychosocial hazard and risk policy evaluation may inform practical interventions that support Emergency Service operational demands. Development should prioritise co-designed interventions with Emergency Service workers to make sure they are relevant to their psychosocial needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.107060
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of psychosocial hazard management across the emergency services sector

Madeline Sprajcer, Matthew J. W. Thomas, Alexander Bachmann, Alastair Ford et al.
Safety Science
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
article

A systematic review of psychosocial hazard management across the emergency services sector

Madeline Sprajcer, Matthew J. W. Thomas, Alexander Bachmann, Alastair Ford, Grace E. Vincent
article en

Abstract

Emergency Service workers face many challenges that impact their mental health and well-being. Of particular concern are psychosocial hazards (e.g., high job demands, exposure to traumatic events, low job control, poor supervisor support, violence, bullying, harassment). Research demonstrates psychosocial hazards are problematic, however, little is known about how they are currently managed in Emergency Services. This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate (1) workplace psychosocial hazard management interventions, (2) intervention effectiveness, and (3) barriers to implementation in the Emergency Services sector. A search of five databases, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and PubMed, identified 13 studies that met inclusion criteria. Quality assessment involved Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal tools. Findings revealed interventions were predominantly reactive (e.g., support provided post-incident) rather than proactive. Interventions included peer support, mental health programs, leadership training, and workplace adjustments (e.g., shift schedule changes, structured downtime). Peer support and leadership training improved mental health awareness and access to mental health resources. Proactive interventions (e.g., shift schedule changes) were associated with improved work-life balance, job satisfaction and improved psychosocial well-being (e.g., reduced burnout and job strain). However, barriers (e.g., stigma, resource constraints) adversely impacted successful implementation. Future research should explore the development of interventions that prioritise preventative factors (e.g., increasing supervisor support, workload adjustments) as part of daily operations. A psychosocial hazard and risk policy evaluation may inform practical interventions that support Emergency Service operational demands. Development should prioritise co-designed interventions with Emergency Service workers to make sure they are relevant to their psychosocial needs.

Safety ScienceVol. 195
Central Queensland University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.