Domestic and international implications of reorienting China’s meat and feed import policies through unilateral liberalization

• We model reoriented feed and meat imports in China via unilateral liberalization. • Importing less feed and more meats leads to domestic tradeoffs but overall benefits. • Rising meat imports improves China’s food security and import diversification. • Globally, it benefits major meat exporters, with slight expense for feed producers. • Liberalizing China’s meat imports improves China’s and global economic welfare. China’s vast livestock sector depends on massive feed grain and oilseeds imports from relatively few suppliers. In contrast, its meat imports, still a relatively small share of its domestic consumption, can be sourced from more suppliers. This study investigates the potential impacts of the reorientation of soybean and meat imports on China’s food security and the associated global spillover effects. We simulate a series of hypothetical unilateral tariff reductions and non-tariff measure relaxation scenarios on meat imports by China, using the GTAP model and a recalibrated GTAP database. Our results indicate that: 1) rising meat imports can help reduce China’s reliance on soybean and maize imports and support its import diversification efforts, especially through reductions of tariff barriers and nontariff measures on pig meats; 2) such a transition promotes diversification in China’s agricultural production structure, reducing maize acreage while encouraging the cultivation of rice, wheat, soybeans, fruits and vegetables, thus strengthening food security in a “Greater Food” approach; 3) at the global scale, this transition can reshape the global grain production structure, benefiting major meat-exporting countries at the expense of feed grain producers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Policy
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.103009
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Domestic and international implications of reorienting China’s meat and feed import policies through unilateral liberalization

Wusheng Yu, Tianxiang Li, Jing Zhu, Rongbo Wang et al.
Food Policy
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Domestic and international implications of reorienting China’s meat and feed import policies through unilateral liberalization

Wusheng Yu, Tianxiang Li, Jing Zhu, Rongbo Wang, Lijuan Cao
article en

Abstract

• We model reoriented feed and meat imports in China via unilateral liberalization. • Importing less feed and more meats leads to domestic tradeoffs but overall benefits. • Rising meat imports improves China’s food security and import diversification. • Globally, it benefits major meat exporters, with slight expense for feed producers. • Liberalizing China’s meat imports improves China’s and global economic welfare. China’s vast livestock sector depends on massive feed grain and oilseeds imports from relatively few suppliers. In contrast, its meat imports, still a relatively small share of its domestic consumption, can be sourced from more suppliers. This study investigates the potential impacts of the reorientation of soybean and meat imports on China’s food security and the associated global spillover effects. We simulate a series of hypothetical unilateral tariff reductions and non-tariff measure relaxation scenarios on meat imports by China, using the GTAP model and a recalibrated GTAP database. Our results indicate that: 1) rising meat imports can help reduce China’s reliance on soybean and maize imports and support its import diversification efforts, especially through reductions of tariff barriers and nontariff measures on pig meats; 2) such a transition promotes diversification in China’s agricultural production structure, reducing maize acreage while encouraging the cultivation of rice, wheat, soybeans, fruits and vegetables, thus strengthening food security in a “Greater Food” approach; 3) at the global scale, this transition can reshape the global grain production structure, benefiting major meat-exporting countries at the expense of feed grain producers.

Food PolicyVol. 138
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), University of Copenhagen (DK), Hainan Tropical Ocean University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nanjing Agricultural University, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, Jiangsu Ocean University
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.