Multilevel Selection in the Margins: A Review of Its Representation in Undergraduate Biology Textbooks

Multilevel selection (MLS) is a foundational framework that expands the concept of natural selection beyond the traditional focus on individuals or genes to larger units, like groups. Despite strong empirical support and applications in a broad range of biological fields, MLS, often referred to as group selection, has a controversial history, which has impeded its wide use and led to incorrect inferences on the sources and strength of selection. Here, we explore how MLS is currently presented to undergraduate biology students by analyzing the content of nine commonly used Evolutionary Biology and Animal Behavior textbooks. We ask whether and how the textbooks describe MLS-as part of the toolbox of evolutionary theory, as a controversial topic, or not at all. Using qualitative textual analysis and descriptive statistics, we found that MLS was mentioned in all of the textbooks analyzed, although usually only in the context of the evolution of social behavior. MLS was generally dismissed as unimportant when compared to individual selection and given less space and fewer examples than kin selection. We highlight the value of a more accurate presentation of MLS and present suggestions for teaching MLS in undergraduate courses based on empirically supported practices in biology education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72493
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multilevel Selection in the Margins: A Review of Its Representation in Undergraduate Biology Textbooks

Conner S. Philson, Sarah J. McPeek, Charlotte Greene, Vincent A. Formica et al.
1 citations
Ecology and Evolution
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
4.20
article

Multilevel Selection in the Margins: A Review of Its Representation in Undergraduate Biology Textbooks

Conner S. Philson, Sarah J. McPeek, Charlotte Greene, Vincent A. Formica, Lisa D Mitchem, Robin A. Costello, Anne B. Clark
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Multilevel selection (MLS) is a foundational framework that expands the concept of natural selection beyond the traditional focus on individuals or genes to larger units, like groups. Despite strong empirical support and applications in a broad range of biological fields, MLS, often referred to as group selection, has a controversial history, which has impeded its wide use and led to incorrect inferences on the sources and strength of selection. Here, we explore how MLS is currently presented to undergraduate biology students by analyzing the content of nine commonly used Evolutionary Biology and Animal Behavior textbooks. We ask whether and how the textbooks describe MLS-as part of the toolbox of evolutionary theory, as a controversial topic, or not at all. Using qualitative textual analysis and descriptive statistics, we found that MLS was mentioned in all of the textbooks analyzed, although usually only in the context of the evolution of social behavior. MLS was generally dismissed as unimportant when compared to individual selection and given less space and fewer examples than kin selection. We highlight the value of a more accurate presentation of MLS and present suggestions for teaching MLS in undergraduate courses based on empirically supported practices in biology education.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(11)
Northern Illinois University (US), Swarthmore College (US), Binghamton University (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (DE), University of Virginia (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.