PSMA-Directed PET/MRI Enables Noninvasive Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients with Increased PSA Levels: Results from the Prospective Randomized RAPID Trial

Systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy lacks accuracy in the primary diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and causes side effects. We investigated prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET/MRI as a less-invasive alternative for biopsy guidance and risk assessment. <b>Methods:</b> The RAPID study was a randomized, controlled, single-center, open-label phase 3 trial comparing the diagnostic efficacy of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. In total, 220 men with suspected PCa were randomized to either a standard (random 12-core biopsy; RB) group or an image-guided biopsy (IGB) group. Biopsy, prostatectomy histology, and follow-up visits served as references. <b>Results:</b> PET/MRI prospectively predicted 91 of 113 histologically verified tumors, corresponding to a sensitivity of 80.5% and a positive predictive value of 84.3%. Among tumors characterized as ISUP GG of 3 or greater (<i>n</i> = 60), PSMA PET/MRI prospectively detected 95% (<i>n</i> = 57). The IGB group demonstrated slightly higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value compared with the RB group (79.3%, 94.7%, 85.2%, 92.2% vs. 74.2%, 88.0%, 71.9%, 89.2%). Seventy-nine patients were eligible for a direct IGB and RB subanalysis, with IGB detecting 15 additional cases. PET/MRI showed high specificity (94%) and negative prediction (86%) for tumor aggressiveness. In a median follow-up period of 3 y, an aggressive course of disease was detected in 25 of 199 patients. RB correlation identified 24 patients with an ISUP GG of 3 or greater with aggressive disease development during follow-up, compared with 23 patients identified by PET/MRI. Negative prediction of both methods was comparably high at 99%; however, PET/MRI overestimated fewer patients (21) as aggressive compared with RB (34). <b>Conclusion:</b> PSMA-targeted PET/MRI-guided biopsy is a reliable, less invasive method for detecting and characterizing PCa in a cohort with moderately increased PSA values, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies and provides a reliable prognosis of the course of disease. These results support the integration of modern imaging techniques into clinical practice to improve the treatment of PCa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.270404
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PSMA-Directed PET/MRI Enables Noninvasive Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients with Increased PSA Levels: Results from the Prospective Randomized RAPID Trial

Sazan Rasul, Alexander Haug, Pascal Baltzer, Martin Susani et al.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

PSMA-Directed PET/MRI Enables Noninvasive Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients with Increased PSA Levels: Results from the Prospective Randomized RAPID Trial

Sazan Rasul, Alexander Haug, Pascal Baltzer, Martin Susani, Sabrina Hartenbach, Thomas Helbich, Markus Hartenbach, Michael Weber, Marko Grahovac, Lukas Kenner, Marcus Hacker, Wolfgang Wadsak, Holger Einspieler, Bernhard Grubmüller, Matthias Eiber, Gero Kramer, Peter Mazal
article en

Abstract

Systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy lacks accuracy in the primary diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and causes side effects. We investigated prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET/MRI as a less-invasive alternative for biopsy guidance and risk assessment. <b>Methods:</b> The RAPID study was a randomized, controlled, single-center, open-label phase 3 trial comparing the diagnostic efficacy of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. In total, 220 men with suspected PCa were randomized to either a standard (random 12-core biopsy; RB) group or an image-guided biopsy (IGB) group. Biopsy, prostatectomy histology, and follow-up visits served as references. <b>Results:</b> PET/MRI prospectively predicted 91 of 113 histologically verified tumors, corresponding to a sensitivity of 80.5% and a positive predictive value of 84.3%. Among tumors characterized as ISUP GG of 3 or greater (<i>n</i> = 60), PSMA PET/MRI prospectively detected 95% (<i>n</i> = 57). The IGB group demonstrated slightly higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value compared with the RB group (79.3%, 94.7%, 85.2%, 92.2% vs. 74.2%, 88.0%, 71.9%, 89.2%). Seventy-nine patients were eligible for a direct IGB and RB subanalysis, with IGB detecting 15 additional cases. PET/MRI showed high specificity (94%) and negative prediction (86%) for tumor aggressiveness. In a median follow-up period of 3 y, an aggressive course of disease was detected in 25 of 199 patients. RB correlation identified 24 patients with an ISUP GG of 3 or greater with aggressive disease development during follow-up, compared with 23 patients identified by PET/MRI. Negative prediction of both methods was comparably high at 99%; however, PET/MRI overestimated fewer patients (21) as aggressive compared with RB (34). <b>Conclusion:</b> PSMA-targeted PET/MRI-guided biopsy is a reliable, less invasive method for detecting and characterizing PCa in a cohort with moderately increased PSA values, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies and provides a reliable prognosis of the course of disease. These results support the integration of modern imaging techniques into clinical practice to improve the treatment of PCa.

Journal of Nuclear MedicineVol. 67(2)
Eutema Technology Management (AT), Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences (AT), Technical University of Munich (DE), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.