Source apportionment of gaseous pollutants in oil and gas extraction areas: A comparison between positive matrix factorization and self-organizing maps approaches

Emissions from oil and gas extraction and processing may represent a significant source of atmospheric pollution, with potential hazards for human health, the environment, and the economy on a local to global scale. In this work, twelve atmospheric pollutants were quantified at hourly time resolution over eight months near the Val d'Agri Oil Center (COVA), the largest onshore oil and natural gas extraction and primary processing facility in Europe, located in a semi-rural area of southern Italy. Temporal trends and average concentration values indicate that few exceedances of regulated species were observed during the investigated period. Two multivariate statistical techniques were employed for source apportionment: the well-established Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) and the neural-network based Self-Organizing Map (SOM) approaches were used, and their results were compared. Both PMF and SOM produced a six-source solution, identifying the main common factors responsible for air quality near COVA, including: photooxidative processes for the production of secondary gaseous species, traffic, and high-temperature COVA operations, in particular gas turbines. Interestingly, although the overlap of some of the sources emerged, likely in association with high-frequency environmental conditions, output differences emerged in the two cases. SOM succeeded in capturing highly episodic and seasonally affected sources (Claus process, gas flaring), while PMF discriminated primary and secondary production of NO<sub>x</sub> and achieved the description of fugitive emissions from extraction wells. Overall, the double approach applied provides a comprehensive description of emission sources, demonstrating that this kind of parallel source apportionment approach, when possible, would be of great benefit to environmental studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of The Total Environment
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180983
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Source apportionment of gaseous pollutants in oil and gas extraction areas: A comparison between positive matrix factorization and self-organizing maps approaches

Alessandro Zappi, Erika Brattich, Manfred A. Biondi, Laura Tositti et al.
The Science of The Total Environment
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
article

Source apportionment of gaseous pollutants in oil and gas extraction areas: A comparison between positive matrix factorization and self-organizing maps approaches

Alessandro Zappi, Erika Brattich, Manfred A. Biondi, Laura Tositti, Rosa Caggiano, Serena Sabia
article en

Abstract

Emissions from oil and gas extraction and processing may represent a significant source of atmospheric pollution, with potential hazards for human health, the environment, and the economy on a local to global scale. In this work, twelve atmospheric pollutants were quantified at hourly time resolution over eight months near the Val d'Agri Oil Center (COVA), the largest onshore oil and natural gas extraction and primary processing facility in Europe, located in a semi-rural area of southern Italy. Temporal trends and average concentration values indicate that few exceedances of regulated species were observed during the investigated period. Two multivariate statistical techniques were employed for source apportionment: the well-established Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) and the neural-network based Self-Organizing Map (SOM) approaches were used, and their results were compared. Both PMF and SOM produced a six-source solution, identifying the main common factors responsible for air quality near COVA, including: photooxidative processes for the production of secondary gaseous species, traffic, and high-temperature COVA operations, in particular gas turbines. Interestingly, although the overlap of some of the sources emerged, likely in association with high-frequency environmental conditions, output differences emerged in the two cases. SOM succeeded in capturing highly episodic and seasonally affected sources (Claus process, gas flaring), while PMF discriminated primary and secondary production of NO<sub>x</sub> and achieved the description of fugitive emissions from extraction wells. Overall, the double approach applied provides a comprehensive description of emission sources, demonstrating that this kind of parallel source apportionment approach, when possible, would be of great benefit to environmental studies.

The Science of The Total EnvironmentVol. 1007
Osservatorio astronomico di Bologna (IT), CNR-IMIOT – Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche - Istituto di Metodologie Integrate per l’Osservazione della Terra (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.