The impact of ISO standards on the diffusion of scientific knowledge

Technical standards have gained increased importance in supporting technological innovation. Within the standardization process, standard-setting organizations (SSOs) build upon scientific and technological knowledge. Consequently, scientific publications can be referenced in a standard. These standard-relevant publications (SR-pubs) remain under-researched thus far, as the literature mainly focuses on standard-essential patents (SEPs). Besides providing some basic patterns regarding SR-pubs, we focus our analyses on the citation patterns of these standard-relevant publications. We hypothesize that a) SR-pubs are more highly cited than the average publication and b) that this is, on the one hand, due to a selection effect, i.e., more highly cited publications are more likely to be referenced in the standard from the start, but on the other hand due to a “reputation effect,” i.e., being referenced in a standard further increases the citation rates of a paper due to a boost in visibility. We test our assumptions using a dynamic difference-in-difference (DID) estimator on a sample of 6754 unique, standard-relevant publications cited in standards published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and a control group that is ten times the size. The results show that SR-pubs are more highly cited than the average publication from the control group. We further find evidence for a strong selection effect, particularly for publications that have already been highly cited before being referenced in a standard. We can also confirm the reputation effect, albeit on a smaller scale than the selection effect, especially for publications that have previously been lowly cited before being referenced in a standard. • Standard-relevant publications receive significantly more citations than average papers • The selection effect drives high citation rates of standard-referenced papers • We can also confirm the reputation effect, albeit on a smaller scale than the selection effect

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Policy
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105371
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of ISO standards on the diffusion of scientific knowledge

Knut Blind, Peter Neuhäusler
Research Policy
Intellectual Property and Patents
article

The impact of ISO standards on the diffusion of scientific knowledge

Knut Blind, Peter Neuhäusler
article en

Abstract

Technical standards have gained increased importance in supporting technological innovation. Within the standardization process, standard-setting organizations (SSOs) build upon scientific and technological knowledge. Consequently, scientific publications can be referenced in a standard. These standard-relevant publications (SR-pubs) remain under-researched thus far, as the literature mainly focuses on standard-essential patents (SEPs). Besides providing some basic patterns regarding SR-pubs, we focus our analyses on the citation patterns of these standard-relevant publications. We hypothesize that a) SR-pubs are more highly cited than the average publication and b) that this is, on the one hand, due to a selection effect, i.e., more highly cited publications are more likely to be referenced in the standard from the start, but on the other hand due to a “reputation effect,” i.e., being referenced in a standard further increases the citation rates of a paper due to a boost in visibility. We test our assumptions using a dynamic difference-in-difference (DID) estimator on a sample of 6754 unique, standard-relevant publications cited in standards published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and a control group that is ten times the size. The results show that SR-pubs are more highly cited than the average publication from the control group. We further find evidence for a strong selection effect, particularly for publications that have already been highly cited before being referenced in a standard. We can also confirm the reputation effect, albeit on a smaller scale than the selection effect, especially for publications that have previously been lowly cited before being referenced in a standard. • Standard-relevant publications receive significantly more citations than average papers • The selection effect drives high citation rates of standard-referenced papers • We can also confirm the reputation effect, albeit on a smaller scale than the selection effect

Research PolicyVol. 55(1)
Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Intellectual Property and Patents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.