The impact of unexpected delays in periodic payments on consumption

We study how unexpected delays in periodic payments affect spending behavior. Our empirical approach uses transaction-level data on income and spending and exploits quasi-random delays in the receipt of unemployment insurance (UI) benefits. Spending drops by about half of the loss in income that occurs while individuals wait for UI benefits, revealing the value of periodic payments for liquidity-constrained individuals. Once delayed payments are received as lump sums, individuals reallocate spending toward less commonly purchased big-ticket categories that are dominated by durables. • We study how unexpected delays in periodic payments affect spending behavior. • UI benefits were delayed for many people during the COVID-19 pandemic. • Spending drops by about half of the loss in income when people wait for UI. • Spending shifts towards durables when delayed UI benefits are received as lump sums. • Our findings inform the discussion on the optimal frequency of benefit transfers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Economics
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105523
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of unexpected delays in periodic payments on consumption

Michael Gelman, Zachary Orlando, Dhiren Patki
Journal of Public Economics
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
article

The impact of unexpected delays in periodic payments on consumption

Michael Gelman, Zachary Orlando, Dhiren Patki
article en

Abstract

We study how unexpected delays in periodic payments affect spending behavior. Our empirical approach uses transaction-level data on income and spending and exploits quasi-random delays in the receipt of unemployment insurance (UI) benefits. Spending drops by about half of the loss in income that occurs while individuals wait for UI benefits, revealing the value of periodic payments for liquidity-constrained individuals. Once delayed payments are received as lump sums, individuals reallocate spending toward less commonly purchased big-ticket categories that are dominated by durables. • We study how unexpected delays in periodic payments affect spending behavior. • UI benefits were delayed for many people during the COVID-19 pandemic. • Spending drops by about half of the loss in income when people wait for UI. • Spending shifts towards durables when delayed UI benefits are received as lump sums. • Our findings inform the discussion on the optimal frequency of benefit transfers.

Journal of Public EconomicsVol. 252
Claremont McKenna College (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of unexpected delays in periodic payments on consumption — Michael Gelman, Zachary Orlando, et al. · Journal of Public Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS