Institutional objection to assisted dying: A qualitative study of stakeholders in Aotearoa New Zealand

As more countries legalize assisted dying (AD), one issue increasingly debated is institutional objection. This is when an institution decides it does not want to provide AD and wishes to prohibit some or all aspects of the AD process from occurring onsite. Aotearoa New Zealand legalized AD in 2021 but its legislation does not address institutional objection. This paper presents the first detailed examination of this issue in Aotearoa New Zealand drawing on the perspectives of 81 key stakeholders in a wider national study of AD. This research identified six themes: institutional objections and their nature vary across settings; the basis for institutional objection; how institutional objection is communicated and navigated; positions of staff in objecting institutions; harms of institutional objections; and changes over time toward greater institutional acceptance of AD. These findings have implications for how AD is regulated in Aotearoa New Zealand and in other countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Death Studies
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2025.2585936
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional objection to assisted dying: A qualitative study of stakeholders in Aotearoa New Zealand

Annabel Ahuriri‐Driscoll, Aida Dehkhoda, Jeanne Snelling, Kate Diesfeld et al.
Death Studies
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Institutional objection to assisted dying: A qualitative study of stakeholders in Aotearoa New Zealand

Annabel Ahuriri‐Driscoll, Aida Dehkhoda, Jeanne Snelling, Kate Diesfeld, Gary Cheung, Tess Moeke‐Maxwell, Jackie Robinson, Jessica E. Young, Ben P. White, Richard Egan, Kate Reid, Te Hurinui Karaka-Clarke
article en

Abstract

As more countries legalize assisted dying (AD), one issue increasingly debated is institutional objection. This is when an institution decides it does not want to provide AD and wishes to prohibit some or all aspects of the AD process from occurring onsite. Aotearoa New Zealand legalized AD in 2021 but its legislation does not address institutional objection. This paper presents the first detailed examination of this issue in Aotearoa New Zealand drawing on the perspectives of 81 key stakeholders in a wider national study of AD. This research identified six themes: institutional objections and their nature vary across settings; the basis for institutional objection; how institutional objection is communicated and navigated; positions of staff in objecting institutions; harms of institutional objections; and changes over time toward greater institutional acceptance of AD. These findings have implications for how AD is regulated in Aotearoa New Zealand and in other countries.

Death Studies
University of Auckland (NZ), Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of Canterbury (NZ), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), University of Waikato (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.