3D-Shape Measurement of Parabolic Trough Mirror Panels:

The 3D-shape round-robin initiative aims to compare the main geometric parameters of 3D shape measurements for parabolic-trough mirror panels, assessed using equipment developed and employed by each participating institution: ENEA, F-ISE, DLR, NREL, and SNL. Except ENEA equipment, all the other are based on deflectometry, also call fringe-reflection method. The round-robin is based on circulating 6 trough mirror panels (3 inner and 3 outer) of RP3 dimensions, with a focal length of 1710 mm, between participating laboratories; a simple and rugged supporting fixture together with precise instruction on how to use it have been provided to make the comparison more reliable. ENEA wrote a custom evaluation software for comparing the results. We observe a reasonable agreement among the mean values of the deviations of height and slopes from the ideal parabola: standard deviation better than 0.1 mm, 0.5 mrad and 0.3 mrad for z, slopeX and slopeY, respectively. The agreement is improved when a software realignment procedure for setting the height values on the support points to the expected ideal values is applied. The absolute difference between pairs of evaluators is sometimes greater than the declared experimental uncertainty; investigation into these deviations is still ongoing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SolarPACES Conference Proceedings
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v3i.2282
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Optical measurement and interference techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D-Shape Measurement of Parabolic Trough Mirror Panels:

Kristina Blume, Francisco Torres, Gregor Bern, Guangdong Zhu et al.
1 citations
SolarPACES Conference Proceedings
Optical measurement and interference techniques
1.28
article

3D-Shape Measurement of Parabolic Trough Mirror Panels:

Kristina Blume, Francisco Torres, Gregor Bern, Guangdong Zhu, Arcangelo Benedetti, Giuseppe Cara, Randy Brost, Devon Kesseli, Tim Schlichting, M. Montecchi, Marc Röger, Braden Smith, Eckhard Lüpfert
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The 3D-shape round-robin initiative aims to compare the main geometric parameters of 3D shape measurements for parabolic-trough mirror panels, assessed using equipment developed and employed by each participating institution: ENEA, F-ISE, DLR, NREL, and SNL. Except ENEA equipment, all the other are based on deflectometry, also call fringe-reflection method. The round-robin is based on circulating 6 trough mirror panels (3 inner and 3 outer) of RP3 dimensions, with a focal length of 1710 mm, between participating laboratories; a simple and rugged supporting fixture together with precise instruction on how to use it have been provided to make the comparison more reliable. ENEA wrote a custom evaluation software for comparing the results. We observe a reasonable agreement among the mean values of the deviations of height and slopes from the ideal parabola: standard deviation better than 0.1 mm, 0.5 mrad and 0.3 mrad for z, slopeX and slopeY, respectively. The agreement is improved when a software realignment procedure for setting the height values on the support points to the expected ideal values is applied. The absolute difference between pairs of evaluators is sometimes greater than the declared experimental uncertainty; investigation into these deviations is still ongoing.

SolarPACES Conference ProceedingsVol. 3
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT), National Laboratory of the Rockies (US), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Sandia National Laboratories (US), Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Optical measurement and interference techniques
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.