Diagnostic Errors in US of the Pancreas: A Comprehensive Case-based Review of Lessons Learned from Quality Assurance Rounds

US is an important diagnostic tool in evaluation of the pancreas, as it is noninvasive, does not require irradiation, and offers real-time imaging capability and broad accessibility. Despite the utility of pancreatic US, it often has limited effectiveness due to the complex anatomy of the pancreas and peripancreatic structures, which inevitably leads to diagnostic errors. The authors summarize the lessons learned from quality assurance rounds at a high-volume tertiary care center. The errors are systematically categorized as perceptual, interpretive, information transfer, and process errors. Each error type is discussed with detailed case studies from clinical practice to underscore common pitfalls and their impact on patient management. Perceptual errors occur when the operators overlook subtle pathologic signs due to the complex anatomy. Interpretive errors arise from misjudgments regarding the clinical significance of visible abnormalities, while information transfer errors stem from inadequate communication of patient history or suboptimal review of previous imaging findings. Process errors reflect systemic issues related to US protocol and scanning techniques. The authors advocate having a thorough understanding of the US appearances of normal and variant pancreatic anatomy and emphasize the importance of correlating US findings with findings of complementary imaging modalities to improve diagnostic accuracy. They also highlight the need to use high-resolution US transducers, embrace new technologies, and adopt meticulous scanning techniques as valuable practical strategies to mitigate diagnostic errors. By providing a detailed analysis of cases, this review demonstrates how structured quality assurance measures and continuous education can significantly reduce diagnostic errors. These efforts are crucial in ensuring accurate diagnoses and optimizing patient outcomes. <sup>©</sup>RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiographics
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.250037
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Errors in US of the Pancreas: A Comprehensive Case-based Review of Lessons Learned from Quality Assurance Rounds

Rafidah Binti Abu Bakar, Ying Ying Kho, Catherine Wan Ting Tan, Irene Ai Linn Wong et al.
Radiographics
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Diagnostic Errors in US of the Pancreas: A Comprehensive Case-based Review of Lessons Learned from Quality Assurance Rounds

Rafidah Binti Abu Bakar, Ying Ying Kho, Catherine Wan Ting Tan, Irene Ai Linn Wong, Nanda Venkatanarasimha, Fengwei Tan, Denise Simin Lau, Voon Chee, Ho Lim Wong, Si Min Teo
article en

Abstract

US is an important diagnostic tool in evaluation of the pancreas, as it is noninvasive, does not require irradiation, and offers real-time imaging capability and broad accessibility. Despite the utility of pancreatic US, it often has limited effectiveness due to the complex anatomy of the pancreas and peripancreatic structures, which inevitably leads to diagnostic errors. The authors summarize the lessons learned from quality assurance rounds at a high-volume tertiary care center. The errors are systematically categorized as perceptual, interpretive, information transfer, and process errors. Each error type is discussed with detailed case studies from clinical practice to underscore common pitfalls and their impact on patient management. Perceptual errors occur when the operators overlook subtle pathologic signs due to the complex anatomy. Interpretive errors arise from misjudgments regarding the clinical significance of visible abnormalities, while information transfer errors stem from inadequate communication of patient history or suboptimal review of previous imaging findings. Process errors reflect systemic issues related to US protocol and scanning techniques. The authors advocate having a thorough understanding of the US appearances of normal and variant pancreatic anatomy and emphasize the importance of correlating US findings with findings of complementary imaging modalities to improve diagnostic accuracy. They also highlight the need to use high-resolution US transducers, embrace new technologies, and adopt meticulous scanning techniques as valuable practical strategies to mitigate diagnostic errors. By providing a detailed analysis of cases, this review demonstrates how structured quality assurance measures and continuous education can significantly reduce diagnostic errors. These efforts are crucial in ensuring accurate diagnoses and optimizing patient outcomes. <sup>©</sup>RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

RadiographicsVol. 45(12)
Singapore General Hospital (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.