Dismantling the fallacies of colonial discourse: teaching logic as a tool for developing critical consciousness

Purpose This article explores how the teaching of fallacies can transcend mere logical exercises to foster critical awareness. Beyond recognizing formal and informal fallacies, the aim is to show how such lessons can uncover the hidden assumptions of colonial discourse, which normalizes Western cultural hegemony through media, education, and entertainment. Design/methodology/approach The approach involves reframing classroom examples of fallacies to highlight not only logical errors but also ideological patterns. By using discourse analysis and critical pedagogy, the teacher can turn the identification of fallacies into a tool for questioning dominant narratives embedded in colonial and postcolonial contexts. Findings Findings suggest that students become more capable of detecting ideological manipulation when fallacies are contextualized within colonial discourse. This pedagogical shift allows learners to recognize how arguments supporting Western superiority are constructed, thereby developing skills not only in logic but also in cultural and political critique. Research limitations/implications The analysis is conceptual and pedagogical rather than empirical, limiting its generalizability. Further research is needed to assess classroom effectiveness and long-term student outcomes when applying this approach to fallacy instruction. Practical implications Teachers can enrich fallacy lessons by incorporating examples of colonial rhetoric, turning logic classes into opportunities for empowerment. This method equips students with tools to question media, institutional messages and cultural hierarchies. Social implications Such teaching contributes to resisting cultural homogenization by fostering independent reasoning and recognition of manipulative discourse. It promotes democratic participation and cultural plurality. Originality/value This study proposes linking logic pedagogy with critical discourse analysis. It introduces a novel perspective: using fallacies as an entry point to dismantle hegemonic cultural narratives, thus expanding the educational value of teaching logic beyond technical reasoning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The SoJo Journal Educational Foundations and Social Justice Education
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sojo-09-2025-0023
Primary Topic
Global Education and Multiculturalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dismantling the fallacies of colonial discourse: teaching logic as a tool for developing critical consciousness

Rafael Félix Mora Ramírez
The SoJo Journal Educational Foundations and Social Justice Education
Global Education and Multiculturalism
article

Dismantling the fallacies of colonial discourse: teaching logic as a tool for developing critical consciousness

Rafael Félix Mora Ramírez
article en

Abstract

Purpose This article explores how the teaching of fallacies can transcend mere logical exercises to foster critical awareness. Beyond recognizing formal and informal fallacies, the aim is to show how such lessons can uncover the hidden assumptions of colonial discourse, which normalizes Western cultural hegemony through media, education, and entertainment. Design/methodology/approach The approach involves reframing classroom examples of fallacies to highlight not only logical errors but also ideological patterns. By using discourse analysis and critical pedagogy, the teacher can turn the identification of fallacies into a tool for questioning dominant narratives embedded in colonial and postcolonial contexts. Findings Findings suggest that students become more capable of detecting ideological manipulation when fallacies are contextualized within colonial discourse. This pedagogical shift allows learners to recognize how arguments supporting Western superiority are constructed, thereby developing skills not only in logic but also in cultural and political critique. Research limitations/implications The analysis is conceptual and pedagogical rather than empirical, limiting its generalizability. Further research is needed to assess classroom effectiveness and long-term student outcomes when applying this approach to fallacy instruction. Practical implications Teachers can enrich fallacy lessons by incorporating examples of colonial rhetoric, turning logic classes into opportunities for empowerment. This method equips students with tools to question media, institutional messages and cultural hierarchies. Social implications Such teaching contributes to resisting cultural homogenization by fostering independent reasoning and recognition of manipulative discourse. It promotes democratic participation and cultural plurality. Originality/value This study proposes linking logic pedagogy with critical discourse analysis. It introduces a novel perspective: using fallacies as an entry point to dismantle hegemonic cultural narratives, thus expanding the educational value of teaching logic beyond technical reasoning.

The SoJo Journal Educational Foundations and Social Justice Education
Federico Villarreal National University (PE), National University of Engineering (NI), National University of Engineering (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Global Education and Multiculturalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.