Uneven Bars? Looking for Environmental Microaggression Effects in NCAA Women’s Gymnastics

We study whether environmental microaggressions, a type of racial microaggression, go unaccounted for by coaches of NCAA Division I women gymnasts of color when competing at any given university hosting women’s gymnastics meets between 2015–2024. NCAA gymnastics meets provide an excellent setting to test for such an effect because, while scores are assigned individually, teams compete collectively, giving coaches incentives to set lineups optimally. We hypothesize that environmental microaggression effects would manifest as institution-specific racial gaps in scoring and employ a difference-in-differences model that quantifies such gaps, controlling for ability-, preparation-, and event-level factors that also contribute to scores. Across two specifications – first, comparing Black gymnasts to White gymnasts, and second, comparing White gymnasts to all other gymnasts – we find no convincing evidence that gymnasts’ scores are affected by an environmental microaggression effect in any way not accounted for prior to setting lineups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Economics
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025251396501
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uneven Bars? Looking for Environmental Microaggression Effects in NCAA Women’s Gymnastics

Tommy Morgan, Seth Cannon
Journal of Sports Economics
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

Uneven Bars? Looking for Environmental Microaggression Effects in NCAA Women’s Gymnastics

Tommy Morgan, Seth Cannon
article en

Abstract

We study whether environmental microaggressions, a type of racial microaggression, go unaccounted for by coaches of NCAA Division I women gymnasts of color when competing at any given university hosting women’s gymnastics meets between 2015–2024. NCAA gymnastics meets provide an excellent setting to test for such an effect because, while scores are assigned individually, teams compete collectively, giving coaches incentives to set lineups optimally. We hypothesize that environmental microaggression effects would manifest as institution-specific racial gaps in scoring and employ a difference-in-differences model that quantifies such gaps, controlling for ability-, preparation-, and event-level factors that also contribute to scores. Across two specifications – first, comparing Black gymnasts to White gymnasts, and second, comparing White gymnasts to all other gymnasts – we find no convincing evidence that gymnasts’ scores are affected by an environmental microaggression effect in any way not accounted for prior to setting lineups.

Journal of Sports EconomicsVol. 27(2)
Knoxville College (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.