Multiscale structural complexity as a quantitative measure of visual complexity

While intuitive for humans, the concept of visual complexity is hard to define and quantify formally. We suggest adopting the multiscale structural complexity (MSSC) measure, an approach that defines structural complexity of an object as the amount of dissimilarities between distinct scales in its hierarchical organization. In this work, we apply MSSC to the case of visual stimuli, using an open dataset of images with subjective complexity scores obtained from human participants (SAVOIAS). We demonstrate that MSSC correlates with subjective complexity on par with other computational complexity measures, while being more intuitive by definition, consistent across categories of images, and easier to compute. We discuss objective and subjective elements inherently present in human perception of complexity and the domains where the two are more likely to diverge. We show how the multiscale nature of MSSC allows further investigation of complexity as it is perceived by humans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perception
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066251384492
Primary Topic
Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiscale structural complexity as a quantitative measure of visual complexity

Veronica Dudarev, M. I. Katsnelson, Andrey A. Bagrov, Anna Kravchenko
Perception
Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
article

Multiscale structural complexity as a quantitative measure of visual complexity

Veronica Dudarev, M. I. Katsnelson, Andrey A. Bagrov, Anna Kravchenko
article en

Abstract

While intuitive for humans, the concept of visual complexity is hard to define and quantify formally. We suggest adopting the multiscale structural complexity (MSSC) measure, an approach that defines structural complexity of an object as the amount of dissimilarities between distinct scales in its hierarchical organization. In this work, we apply MSSC to the case of visual stimuli, using an open dataset of images with subjective complexity scores obtained from human participants (SAVOIAS). We demonstrate that MSSC correlates with subjective complexity on par with other computational complexity measures, while being more intuitive by definition, consistent across categories of images, and easier to compute. We discuss objective and subjective elements inherently present in human perception of complexity and the domains where the two are more likely to diverge. We show how the multiscale nature of MSSC allows further investigation of complexity as it is perceived by humans.

PerceptionVol. 55(2)
University of British Columbia (CA), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multiscale structural complexity as a quantitative measure of visual complexity — Veronica Dudarev, M. I. Katsnelson, et al. · Perception (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS