Remembering past present biases

This study examines a potential link between present bias and reduced memory accuracy in intertemporal decision-making. In a classroom experiment with university students, participants made choices between smaller-sooner and larger-later rewards on two occasions. The second time included an immediate option, tempting present-biased participants to choose the immediate reward. During a third visit, participants were randomized into two groups and asked to recall their decisions from one of the previous visits. The results show that participants with present bias had lower memory accuracy than their time-consistent peers in situations involving immediate rewards. Regression analysis indicates that this reduced accuracy is consistent with motivated misremembering – in which individuals recall their past decisions as more virtuous than they actually were. Robustness checks reveal that time inconsistency is positively associated with lower memory accuracy in general, but present-biased participants exhibit clearly distinct patterns compared to their future-biased counterparts. These results are weighed against alternative explanations, notably the possibility of noisy cognition. • The study explores how present bias influences memory accuracy. • Present bias affects memory accuracy, especially in immediate reward scenarios. • Motivated memory may cause individuals to recall past decisions as more virtuous. • Time-inconsistency is positively associated with lower memory accuracy in general. • Present-biased participants recall fewer earlier choices than time-consistent peers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2025.102484
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remembering past present biases

Hubert János Kiss, Barna Bakó, Antal Ertl
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Remembering past present biases

Hubert János Kiss, Barna Bakó, Antal Ertl
article en

Abstract

This study examines a potential link between present bias and reduced memory accuracy in intertemporal decision-making. In a classroom experiment with university students, participants made choices between smaller-sooner and larger-later rewards on two occasions. The second time included an immediate option, tempting present-biased participants to choose the immediate reward. During a third visit, participants were randomized into two groups and asked to recall their decisions from one of the previous visits. The results show that participants with present bias had lower memory accuracy than their time-consistent peers in situations involving immediate rewards. Regression analysis indicates that this reduced accuracy is consistent with motivated misremembering – in which individuals recall their past decisions as more virtuous than they actually were. Robustness checks reveal that time inconsistency is positively associated with lower memory accuracy in general, but present-biased participants exhibit clearly distinct patterns compared to their future-biased counterparts. These results are weighed against alternative explanations, notably the possibility of noisy cognition. • The study explores how present bias influences memory accuracy. • Present bias affects memory accuracy, especially in immediate reward scenarios. • Motivated memory may cause individuals to recall past decisions as more virtuous. • Time-inconsistency is positively associated with lower memory accuracy in general. • Present-biased participants recall fewer earlier choices than time-consistent peers.

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental EconomicsVol. 120
Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), ELTE Centre for Economic and Regional Studies (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.