Clinical and proteomic evidence supporting the significance of individualized homeopathic treatment in depression

This Letter to the Editor addresses concerns raised about our recently published N-of-1 trial on an individualized integrative approach for major depressive disorder. N-of-1 designs inherently control for baseline variability, as each participant serves as their own control across randomized treatment periods. The psychiatric diagnosis was confirmed by experienced clinicians using DSM-5 criteria, consistent with pragmatic practice. Although the participant entered the double-blind phase in remission, within-subject analyses showed a clinically meaningful 78% improvement on the Beck Depression Inventory-II with homeopathic Sulphur compared with placebo, corroborated by parallel SF-12 Mental Component findings. Proteomic analyses further revealed immune-inflammatory modulation, offering biological convergence. These clinical and molecular findings support the validity of this individualized integrative approach and call for replication in more N-of-1 trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Behavior and Immunity Integrative
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbii.2025.100141
Primary Topic
Treatment of Major Depression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and proteomic evidence supporting the significance of individualized homeopathic treatment in depression

Lia Lira Olivier Sanders, U. Adler
Brain Behavior and Immunity Integrative
Treatment of Major Depression
article

Clinical and proteomic evidence supporting the significance of individualized homeopathic treatment in depression

Lia Lira Olivier Sanders, U. Adler
article en

Abstract

This Letter to the Editor addresses concerns raised about our recently published N-of-1 trial on an individualized integrative approach for major depressive disorder. N-of-1 designs inherently control for baseline variability, as each participant serves as their own control across randomized treatment periods. The psychiatric diagnosis was confirmed by experienced clinicians using DSM-5 criteria, consistent with pragmatic practice. Although the participant entered the double-blind phase in remission, within-subject analyses showed a clinically meaningful 78% improvement on the Beck Depression Inventory-II with homeopathic Sulphur compared with placebo, corroborated by parallel SF-12 Mental Component findings. Proteomic analyses further revealed immune-inflammatory modulation, offering biological convergence. These clinical and molecular findings support the validity of this individualized integrative approach and call for replication in more N-of-1 trials.

Brain Behavior and Immunity IntegrativeVol. 12
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Treatment of Major Depression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.