Unlearning Agency: Lessons from Cults

This paper investigates a type of agential impairment that has not been fully appreciated in the philosophical literature: unlearning agency, a process which undermines or destroys its victim’s sense of self and agential competence. This type of manipulation is prominent in cults and is vividly displayed by the puzzling phenomenon of cult members seeming to harm themselves despite doing what they claim they want to do, as when several men in Heaven’s Gate cult volunteered to castrate themselves in accordance with their beliefs. Drawing on the literature on cults and using Heaven’s Gate as its test case, this paper distinguishes unlearning agency from other agential impairments in the philosophical literature. It then explores why unlearning agency matters. Understanding this type of agential damage not only highlights a new type of exemption from moral responsibility, but also outlines methods of rehabilitating agency. Furthermore, it provides an explanation for why cults can harm members who are doing what they want to do, without having to rely on an objective theory of well-being. Finally, this paper explores how unlearning agency can arise in other contexts besides cults. Thus, we should take this threat to agency seriously.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.8582
Primary Topic
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unlearning Agency: Lessons from Cults

Joseph Metz
Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
article

Unlearning Agency: Lessons from Cults

Joseph Metz
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates a type of agential impairment that has not been fully appreciated in the philosophical literature: unlearning agency, a process which undermines or destroys its victim’s sense of self and agential competence. This type of manipulation is prominent in cults and is vividly displayed by the puzzling phenomenon of cult members seeming to harm themselves despite doing what they claim they want to do, as when several men in Heaven’s Gate cult volunteered to castrate themselves in accordance with their beliefs. Drawing on the literature on cults and using Heaven’s Gate as its test case, this paper distinguishes unlearning agency from other agential impairments in the philosophical literature. It then explores why unlearning agency matters. Understanding this type of agential damage not only highlights a new type of exemption from moral responsibility, but also outlines methods of rehabilitating agency. Furthermore, it provides an explanation for why cults can harm members who are doing what they want to do, without having to rely on an objective theory of well-being. Finally, this paper explores how unlearning agency can arise in other contexts besides cults. Thus, we should take this threat to agency seriously.

Ergo an Open Access Journal of PhilosophyVol. 12(0)
Widener University (US)
Florida State University, Western Michigan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.