Open versus laparoscopic techniques for incisional hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated no significant differences in primary clinical outcomes between open and laparoscopic incisional hernia repair techniques. Both approaches had comparable complication and recurrence rates. However, laparoscopic repair might provide advantages of faster recovery and improved postoperative quality of life, and therefore is a viable alternative to open repair for suitable candidates. Further studies with larger sample sizes and standardized protocols are necessary to confirm these findings.
Authors
- Joud Alghamdi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9757-9037)
- Faisal Alghamdi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2598-255X)
- Lujain Alzahrani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1606-3559)
- Ghaida Mohammed Alghamdi
- Thamer Alghamdi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7201-2655)
- Naif A. Alharthi
- Yara A. Alghamdi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8114-1506)
Institutions
- Pancreas Centre (Canada) (CA)
- Al Baha University (SA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences
- Published
- 2025-11-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2025.10.004
- Primary Topic
- Hernia repair and management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00