Multi-institutional virtual peer review for reirradiation: dedicated workflow and one-year results
This study reports one-year results from multidisciplinary and multi-institutional virtual peer review meetings for reirradiation cases. A dedicated workflow supported collaborative decision-making, especially for complex treatments, and guided dose prescriptions and cumulative dose evaluations. The indication of reRT was disapproved for 19% of the cases, while the reRT dose prescription was suggested or modified for 45% of the validated indications. Results confirm feasibility and clinical value, fostering safer and more standardized reirradiation practices across institutions.
Authors
- Coralie Moncharmont (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4857-759X)
- Pauline Dupuis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2385-8117)
- ISABELL E. MARTEL-LAFAY
- Andrew F Alexis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1351-9165)
- Loïg Vaugier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0728-0693)
- Marie de Lange (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7789-6149)
- Guillaume Beldjoudi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7332-3383)
- Alexandra Moignier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5395-0830)
- Valentine Guimas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3867-8891)
- LIN E. CLAUDE
- M. Ayadi
- Sophie Chiavassa
- Anne-Agathe Serre
- Marie Pierre Sunyach
- L. Ollivier
- M. Sandt
Institutions
- Centre Léon Bérard (FR)
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
- Published
- 2025-11-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100357
- Primary Topic
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00