Daily Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis Rates Do Not Differ During Interval Compared to Continuous Exercise Training Matched for Duration and Work in Healthy Young Men

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) may elicit different skeletal muscle responses compared to work-matched moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). The effect of work-matched HIIT versus MICT on myofibrillar protein synthesis remains to be determined. In the present study, we assessed the effect of short-term HIIT versus MICT on myofibrillar protein synthesis rates using a single-leg within-participant design. Ten healthy young men (age: 20 ± 1 years) performed six to eight training sessions with each leg over 2 weeks while ingesting deuterated water to assess myofibrillar protein synthesis. One leg was randomly assigned to perform HIIT and the other MICT. Skeletal muscle biopsies were collected at rest from one leg before and after a 2-week habituation period and from both legs after the training period to assess myofibrillar protein synthesis rates. HIIT and MICT increased single-leg maximal power output (main effect, p < .01), with no differences between legs (interaction: p = .61). Myofibrillar protein synthesis rates did not differ between the habituation period, MICT, or HIIT (1.39 ± 0.16%, 1.24 ± 0.30%, and 1.42 ± 0.31% per day, respectively; p = .29). In conclusion, we observed no detectable differences in daily myofibrillar protein synthesis rates between HIIT or work-matched MICT when assessed over a 2-week exercise training period in recreationally active young adult men.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2025-0074
Primary Topic
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Daily Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis Rates Do Not Differ During Interval Compared to Continuous Exercise Training Matched for Duration and Work in Healthy Young Men

Martin J. MacInnis, Dinesh Kumbhare, Joshua P. Nederveen, Jorn Trommelen et al.
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
article

Daily Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis Rates Do Not Differ During Interval Compared to Continuous Exercise Training Matched for Duration and Work in Healthy Young Men

Martin J. MacInnis, Dinesh Kumbhare, Joshua P. Nederveen, Jorn Trommelen, Bryon R. McKay, Stuart M. Phillips, Sara Y. Oikawa, Martin J. Gibala, Jean Nyakayiru, Gianni Parise, Luc J. C. van Loon
article en

Abstract

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) may elicit different skeletal muscle responses compared to work-matched moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). The effect of work-matched HIIT versus MICT on myofibrillar protein synthesis remains to be determined. In the present study, we assessed the effect of short-term HIIT versus MICT on myofibrillar protein synthesis rates using a single-leg within-participant design. Ten healthy young men (age: 20 ± 1 years) performed six to eight training sessions with each leg over 2 weeks while ingesting deuterated water to assess myofibrillar protein synthesis. One leg was randomly assigned to perform HIIT and the other MICT. Skeletal muscle biopsies were collected at rest from one leg before and after a 2-week habituation period and from both legs after the training period to assess myofibrillar protein synthesis rates. HIIT and MICT increased single-leg maximal power output (main effect, p < .01), with no differences between legs (interaction: p = .61). Myofibrillar protein synthesis rates did not differ between the habituation period, MICT, or HIIT (1.39 ± 0.16%, 1.24 ± 0.30%, and 1.42 ± 0.31% per day, respectively; p = .29). In conclusion, we observed no detectable differences in daily myofibrillar protein synthesis rates between HIIT or work-matched MICT when assessed over a 2-week exercise training period in recreationally active young adult men.

International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise MetabolismVol. 36(1)
University of British Columbia (CA), Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (CA), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.