Experimental investigation and discrete element modeling of acoustic emission characteristics, crack evolution, and energy variation in shale specimens during uniaxial compression

• Tensile cracks dominate failure (tensile-to-shear crack ratio = 2.8), driving AE surges and peak energy release. • Elastic modulus has a far greater impact on crack generation (61.89% increase when doubled) than bond strength (1.2% increase when doubled). • Numerical model’s crack initiation (70% of peak strength) and damage strengths (90% of peak strength) are 15–20% higher than specimens with natural microcracks. • Provides guidance for shale gas extraction (focus on high-elastic-modulus formations) and geo-mechanical stability monitoring. Elucidating the deformational attributes and mechanical properties of shale is crucial for shale gas exploitation. Based on laboratory tests (displacement-controlled loading, 0.1 mm/min) and acoustic emission (AE) tests, combined with two-dimensional particle flow code simulations (loading rate, 0.6 mm/min), the AE evolution, energy conversion and crack propagation laws were analyzed under three different operating conditions. The average macro-mechanical parameters are as follows: peak strength of 41.38 MPa, elastic modulus of 10.6 GPa, Poisson's ratio of 0.30 and porosity of 3.23%. Key findings are as follows: low-strength specimens have 23.78% fewer cumulative ring-down counts in the first three AE stages than high-strength specimens, whereas the incremental ring-down count of high-strength specimens in the fourth stage is 6 times that of low-strength specimens. In the model, the first tensile crack initiates at 70% of peak strength (crack initiation strength), and massive cracking occurs at 90% of peak strength (damage strength); both strengths are 15–20% higher than laboratory specimens with natural microcracks, as natural microcracks induce stress concentrations and lower strength thresholds. Tensile cracks dominated failure: the average tensile-to-shear crack ratio across three conditions was 2.8. AE surges are driven by tensile crack propagation/coalescence, consistent with peak energy release. Elastic modulus has a greater impact on crack generation than bond strength: doubling elastic modulus increased cracks by 61.89%, while doubling bond strength increased cracks by only 1.2%, emphasizing attention to high-elastic-modulus formations in shale gas extraction. This work enhances understanding of AE-crack-meso-property coupling and provides guidance for safety monitoring and engineering design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108317
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental investigation and discrete element modeling of acoustic emission characteristics, crack evolution, and energy variation in shale specimens during uniaxial compression

Chee‐Ming Chan, Wei Chi, Yilei Gu, Wenjie Wu et al.
1 citations
Results in Engineering
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
0.86
article

Experimental investigation and discrete element modeling of acoustic emission characteristics, crack evolution, and energy variation in shale specimens during uniaxial compression

Chee‐Ming Chan, Wei Chi, Yilei Gu, Wenjie Wu, Mingqing Liu, Xiaopeng Su
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Tensile cracks dominate failure (tensile-to-shear crack ratio = 2.8), driving AE surges and peak energy release. • Elastic modulus has a far greater impact on crack generation (61.89% increase when doubled) than bond strength (1.2% increase when doubled). • Numerical model’s crack initiation (70% of peak strength) and damage strengths (90% of peak strength) are 15–20% higher than specimens with natural microcracks. • Provides guidance for shale gas extraction (focus on high-elastic-modulus formations) and geo-mechanical stability monitoring. Elucidating the deformational attributes and mechanical properties of shale is crucial for shale gas exploitation. Based on laboratory tests (displacement-controlled loading, 0.1 mm/min) and acoustic emission (AE) tests, combined with two-dimensional particle flow code simulations (loading rate, 0.6 mm/min), the AE evolution, energy conversion and crack propagation laws were analyzed under three different operating conditions. The average macro-mechanical parameters are as follows: peak strength of 41.38 MPa, elastic modulus of 10.6 GPa, Poisson's ratio of 0.30 and porosity of 3.23%. Key findings are as follows: low-strength specimens have 23.78% fewer cumulative ring-down counts in the first three AE stages than high-strength specimens, whereas the incremental ring-down count of high-strength specimens in the fourth stage is 6 times that of low-strength specimens. In the model, the first tensile crack initiates at 70% of peak strength (crack initiation strength), and massive cracking occurs at 90% of peak strength (damage strength); both strengths are 15–20% higher than laboratory specimens with natural microcracks, as natural microcracks induce stress concentrations and lower strength thresholds. Tensile cracks dominated failure: the average tensile-to-shear crack ratio across three conditions was 2.8. AE surges are driven by tensile crack propagation/coalescence, consistent with peak energy release. Elastic modulus has a greater impact on crack generation than bond strength: doubling elastic modulus increased cracks by 61.89%, while doubling bond strength increased cracks by only 1.2%, emphasizing attention to high-elastic-modulus formations in shale gas extraction. This work enhances understanding of AE-crack-meso-property coupling and provides guidance for safety monitoring and engineering design.

Results in EngineeringVol. 28
Wenzhou University (CN), Chongqing University (CN), Yunnan Forestry Vocational and Technical College (CN), Wenzhou University of Technology, Chongqing Jiaotong University (CN), Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.