Assessing the sustainability and circularity of product families: A systematic review on indicators and methodologies

Manufacturing companies often adopt the product family approach to offer a wide range of products efficiently and cost-effectively. With the growing emphasis on the sustainability and circularity of product families, extensive research has evaluated these aspects in recent decades. Building upon this existing research, this study aims to identify the most prevalent indicators and methodologies employed for their assessments. A systematic literature review yielded 40 relevant articles. The results reveal that existing indicators and methodologies are often data-intensive and resource-consuming, making the assessment of the sustainability and circularity of product families a complicated and extensive process. Findings also show that only four circularity strategies (i.e., remanufacture, reuse, recycle, and refurbish) were investigated for product families. Furthermore, most circularity indicators considered in these assessments are strategy-specific, and no generic indicators exist for a holistic assessment of circularity for product families. Moreover, most studies focus solely on carbon footprint assessment, overlooking other impact categories. Additionally, the social aspect was scarcely investigated in literature for product families. Finally, most of the reviewed studies evaluated the sustainability and circularity of product families within electric and electronic equipment. Based on these findings, this work underlines the need for more efficient methodologies and indicators, while establishing relationships among economic, environmental, social, and circularity dimensions to support the development of sustainable and circular product families. It is also strongly recommended to assess the impact of additional circularity strategies beyond the four investigated and to broaden environmental impact assessments to include diverse impact categories alongside social considerations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2025.101118
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the sustainability and circularity of product families: A systematic review on indicators and methodologies

Karel Van Acker, Philippe Nimmegeers, Giovanna Sauve, Elisa Prieto et al.
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Assessing the sustainability and circularity of product families: A systematic review on indicators and methodologies

Karel Van Acker, Philippe Nimmegeers, Giovanna Sauve, Elisa Prieto, Steven Van Passel, Sofia Boulmrharj
article en

Abstract

Manufacturing companies often adopt the product family approach to offer a wide range of products efficiently and cost-effectively. With the growing emphasis on the sustainability and circularity of product families, extensive research has evaluated these aspects in recent decades. Building upon this existing research, this study aims to identify the most prevalent indicators and methodologies employed for their assessments. A systematic literature review yielded 40 relevant articles. The results reveal that existing indicators and methodologies are often data-intensive and resource-consuming, making the assessment of the sustainability and circularity of product families a complicated and extensive process. Findings also show that only four circularity strategies (i.e., remanufacture, reuse, recycle, and refurbish) were investigated for product families. Furthermore, most circularity indicators considered in these assessments are strategy-specific, and no generic indicators exist for a holistic assessment of circularity for product families. Moreover, most studies focus solely on carbon footprint assessment, overlooking other impact categories. Additionally, the social aspect was scarcely investigated in literature for product families. Finally, most of the reviewed studies evaluated the sustainability and circularity of product families within electric and electronic equipment. Based on these findings, this work underlines the need for more efficient methodologies and indicators, while establishing relationships among economic, environmental, social, and circularity dimensions to support the development of sustainable and circular product families. It is also strongly recommended to assess the impact of additional circularity strategies beyond the four investigated and to broaden environmental impact assessments to include diverse impact categories alongside social considerations.

Cleaner Engineering and TechnologyVol. 30
University of Antwerp (BE), Antwerp Management School (BE), Flanders Make (Belgium) (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.