Variations in morbidity and mortality based on esophagectomy approach and leak status: Insights from a statewide quality collaborative

Anastomotic leak remains a major source of morbidity after esophagectomy. Cervical anastomoses have been associated with higher leak rates compared with intrathoracic anastomoses; however, cervical leaks may have a less severe clinical impact. The aim was to determine whether the patterns of leak occurrence and severity varied by surgical approach among institutions at a regional level. We retrospectively reviewed data for patients who underwent open or minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy or transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between January 2015 and March 2023 at 13 centers. Patients were stratified by procedure type and leak rates, and postoperative complications were examined. Logistic regression assessed associations among the surgical technique, leak rates, and postoperative complications. A total of 1230 patients undergoing esophagectomies were reviewed: 500 (41%) with open transhiatal esophagectomy, 135 (11%) with open transthoracic esophagectomy, 258 (21%) with minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy, and 337 (27%) with minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy. Leak rates ranged from 14% to 23%, with the highest rate observed in minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy and the lowest in open transthoracic esophagectomy ( P = . 081). Among those with leaks, open transthoracic esophagectomy had the longest length of stay (25 days, interquartile range, 12-33) compared with transhiatal esophagectomy groups (12-14 days, P = . 003). Pneumonia (42%, P < . 001), empyema requiring intervention (21%, P = . 004), and sepsis (26%, P = . 027) were significantly higher in the open transthoracic esophagectomy group compared with other groups. In-hospital mortality after a leak was highest in open transthoracic esophagectomy (16%) compared with 3% in open transhiatal esophagectomy and 1% in minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy and transthoracic esophagectomy groups ( P = . 025). Although leak rates are higher with transhiatal esophagectomy, open transthoracic esophagectomy is associated with greater morbidity and mortality after leak.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JTCVS Open
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2025.11.010
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variations in morbidity and mortality based on esophagectomy approach and leak status: Insights from a statewide quality collaborative

Jenny Bui, Donald Chang, Geoffrey Lam, Shelly C. Lall et al.
JTCVS Open
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Variations in morbidity and mortality based on esophagectomy approach and leak status: Insights from a statewide quality collaborative

Jenny Bui, Donald Chang, Geoffrey Lam, Shelly C. Lall, Kevin R. Ward, Kiran Hari Lagisetty, Andrew M. Popoff, Kumari N. Adams, Rishindra M. Reddy, Thomas J. Watson, Mary Hollenbeck
article en

Abstract

Anastomotic leak remains a major source of morbidity after esophagectomy. Cervical anastomoses have been associated with higher leak rates compared with intrathoracic anastomoses; however, cervical leaks may have a less severe clinical impact. The aim was to determine whether the patterns of leak occurrence and severity varied by surgical approach among institutions at a regional level. We retrospectively reviewed data for patients who underwent open or minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy or transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between January 2015 and March 2023 at 13 centers. Patients were stratified by procedure type and leak rates, and postoperative complications were examined. Logistic regression assessed associations among the surgical technique, leak rates, and postoperative complications. A total of 1230 patients undergoing esophagectomies were reviewed: 500 (41%) with open transhiatal esophagectomy, 135 (11%) with open transthoracic esophagectomy, 258 (21%) with minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy, and 337 (27%) with minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy. Leak rates ranged from 14% to 23%, with the highest rate observed in minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy and the lowest in open transthoracic esophagectomy ( P = . 081). Among those with leaks, open transthoracic esophagectomy had the longest length of stay (25 days, interquartile range, 12-33) compared with transhiatal esophagectomy groups (12-14 days, P = . 003). Pneumonia (42%, P < . 001), empyema requiring intervention (21%, P = . 004), and sepsis (26%, P = . 027) were significantly higher in the open transthoracic esophagectomy group compared with other groups. In-hospital mortality after a leak was highest in open transthoracic esophagectomy (16%) compared with 3% in open transhiatal esophagectomy and 1% in minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy and transthoracic esophagectomy groups ( P = . 025). Although leak rates are higher with transhiatal esophagectomy, open transthoracic esophagectomy is associated with greater morbidity and mortality after leak.

JTCVS OpenVol. 29
Trinity Health (US), Munson Medical Center (US), Henry Ford Health System (US), University of Michigan (US), Society of Thoracic Surgeons (US), Henry Ford Hospital (US), Regional Health (US), Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak (US), Ann Arbor Center for Independent Living (US), Beaumont Hospital, Troy (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.