Health disinformation: a call to action for the hemostasis and thrombosis community

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed a parallel crisis: an infodemic of unprecedented scale and impact. This wave of misinformation and disinformation-particularly around thrombosis, vaccines, and hemostasis-has undermined public health measures, eroded institutional trust, and endangered scientific credibility. Within this hostile informational ecosystem, fringe theories proliferated across social media, falsely linking COVID-19 vaccines to widespread thrombosis via misinterpretations of D-dimer levels and anecdotal claims unsupported by clinical evidence. Political agendas, emotional manipulation, and algorithm-driven amplification created fertile ground for disinformation to thrive-especially among vulnerable populations like youth and vaccine-hesitant communities. The article dissects how belief bias, trust shortcuts, groupthink, and platform algorithms contributed to the viral spread of falsehoods about thrombosis and hemostasis. Case studies include the misuse of hydroxychloroquine, antivaccine conspiracy movements, and the misleading portrayal of rare vaccine-induced clotting events. The consequences were severe: declining vaccine uptake, harassment of scientists, and growing skepticism toward evidence-based medicine. This article calls on the hemostasis and thrombosis community to move beyond passive dissemination of knowledge. It proposes a 4-pillar strategy: embedding scientific voices in digital discourse, reforming media and health literacy education, enforcing stronger regulatory frameworks, and institutionalizing collective scientific engagement in mainstream and social media. As future health crises loom, communication must become as central as research itself. The article argues that the next battle for public health will be waged not only in hospitals and laboratories but also in the information spaces where truth competes with virality. It is time for science to go viral-for the right reasons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2025.103272
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health disinformation: a call to action for the hemostasis and thrombosis community

David M. Smadja
1 citations
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
article

Health disinformation: a call to action for the hemostasis and thrombosis community

David M. Smadja
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed a parallel crisis: an infodemic of unprecedented scale and impact. This wave of misinformation and disinformation-particularly around thrombosis, vaccines, and hemostasis-has undermined public health measures, eroded institutional trust, and endangered scientific credibility. Within this hostile informational ecosystem, fringe theories proliferated across social media, falsely linking COVID-19 vaccines to widespread thrombosis via misinterpretations of D-dimer levels and anecdotal claims unsupported by clinical evidence. Political agendas, emotional manipulation, and algorithm-driven amplification created fertile ground for disinformation to thrive-especially among vulnerable populations like youth and vaccine-hesitant communities. The article dissects how belief bias, trust shortcuts, groupthink, and platform algorithms contributed to the viral spread of falsehoods about thrombosis and hemostasis. Case studies include the misuse of hydroxychloroquine, antivaccine conspiracy movements, and the misleading portrayal of rare vaccine-induced clotting events. The consequences were severe: declining vaccine uptake, harassment of scientists, and growing skepticism toward evidence-based medicine. This article calls on the hemostasis and thrombosis community to move beyond passive dissemination of knowledge. It proposes a 4-pillar strategy: embedding scientific voices in digital discourse, reforming media and health literacy education, enforcing stronger regulatory frameworks, and institutionalizing collective scientific engagement in mainstream and social media. As future health crises loom, communication must become as central as research itself. The article argues that the next battle for public health will be waged not only in hospitals and laboratories but also in the information spaces where truth competes with virality. It is time for science to go viral-for the right reasons.

Research and Practice in Thrombosis and HaemostasisVol. 9(8)
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.