Evaluating the potential of ChatGPT for patient identification in clinical breast cancer trials

While model performance was limited by simplified input data and a small single-center cohort, the results suggest that ChatGPT-4.0, in its current form, is not yet suitable as a stand-alone tool for patient identification in clinical breast cancer trials. To ensure accurate and efficient recruitment, the involvement of a multiprofessional team remains essential. Ongoing model refinement and access to larger, more detailed datasets may enhance the future utility of AI systems in clinical trial screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Health
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251389325
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the potential of ChatGPT for patient identification in clinical breast cancer trials

Carolin C. Hack, Oliver Schleicher, Peter A. Fasching, Lothar Häberle et al.
Digital Health
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Evaluating the potential of ChatGPT for patient identification in clinical breast cancer trials

Carolin C. Hack, Oliver Schleicher, Peter A. Fasching, Lothar Häberle, Felix Heindl, Matthias W. Beckmann, Katharina Seitz, Annika Krückel, Julius Emons, Lena Brückner, Julia Gocke
article en

Abstract

While model performance was limited by simplified input data and a small single-center cohort, the results suggest that ChatGPT-4.0, in its current form, is not yet suitable as a stand-alone tool for patient identification in clinical breast cancer trials. To ensure accurate and efficient recruitment, the involvement of a multiprofessional team remains essential. Ongoing model refinement and access to larger, more detailed datasets may enhance the future utility of AI systems in clinical trial screening.

Digital HealthVol. 11
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.